Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Bishops' Task Force to Discuss Pro-Abortion Politicians In Wake of Card. Arinze's Comments
zenit.org ^ | 4/26/04 | zenit.org

Posted on 04/26/2004 4:30:38 PM PDT by Polycarp IV

ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome


Code: ZE04042623

Date: 2004-04-26

U.S. Bishops' Task Force to Discuss Pro-Abortion Politicians

In Wake of Cardinal Arinze's Comments

WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 26, 2004 (Zenit.org).- A task force set up the U.S. bishops' conference will discuss the reception of sacraments by Catholics whose political advocacy directly contradicts Church teaching.

Bishop Wilton Gregory, president of the episcopal conference, announced the task force in the wake of a Vatican press conference last week in which Cardinal Francis Arinze said that politicians who support abortion must not go to Communion. He also said that priests must deny such politicians the sacrament.

Cardinal Arinze, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, was presenting a new Vatican instruction, "Redemptionis Sacramentum" (The Sacrament of Redemption), aimed at ensuring the proper celebration and reception of the Eucharist.

Bishop Gregory noted that the prefect's comments extended to U.S. politicians and said: "Cardinal Arinze stated it is the responsibility of the bishops of the United States to deal pastorally with such situations as they exist here."

"Each diocesan bishop has the right and duty to address such issues of serious pastoral concern as he judges best in his local church, in accord with pastoral and canonical norms," Bishop Gregory said.

"To assist us in our common discernment, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has established a task force to discuss issues with regard to the participation of Catholics in political life, including reception of the sacraments, in the cases of those whose political advocacy is in direct contradiction to Church teaching," he said.

"The establishment of this task force is a clear sign of the seriousness with which we take these issues and continue to consider how best to interpret and apply the norms of the Church in their regard," said the bishop of Belleville, Illinois.

He added: "It has always been our hope and expectation as bishops that men and women in political life, whatever their religious convictions, would be guided by and live out the truth of the faith given them by God with integrity."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; catholicpoliticians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: narses
(BTW, when was the last time a major party nominated a pro-murder Catholic for President?).

That in itself should be of grave concern to the bishops and to the Vatican. Catholics are called to set a moral example for others. We are called to chart a course for life and for a civilization of love. It is the divine duty of Catholics to prevent and oppose the slaughter of innocent life. Anyone who publicly refuses thi udty is NOT a Catholic. John Kerry is no longer a Catholic. Kick him out. They should do this publicly with a lot of noise.

Bishops, please cleanse our church of this demonic rot !!!

61 posted on 04/26/2004 7:34:50 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
So, essentially you are saying, 'do nothing'.

Deny Kerry the Eucharist on the first day of Advent, 2004.

But, not during this election season.

Do you want to see Kerry elected on the back of a delayed action by the American bishops?

62 posted on 04/26/2004 7:34:58 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Cute Deacon, dishonest, but cute.

You neglected the REST of the story:

"Forgotten are the facts that Killea's win was no landslide, she outspent her opponent nearly three-to-one, and the college of bishops showed little collegiality toward Bishop Maher at the time."

63 posted on 04/26/2004 7:35:33 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: narses
This kind of thing, if not handled deftly, has a way of backfiring.
Care to share examples of Bishops with backbones that have had their efforts 'backfire'?

The first example to come to mind would be Pope Leo X vs. Marin Luther.
64 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:10 PM PDT by lnbjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lnbjohnson
I think this falls under the "be careful what you ask for" category. What happens when some bishop somewhere in the world expands on this to forbid communion to politicians who support the war in Iraq? ...or to anyone speaking ill of their bishop? Will you be as supportive? Will you stop receiving communion? Not long ago to was almost impossible for a Catholic to get elected in this country because of the fear that they would be "taking orders from Rome." If the Vatican wins on this issue, it won't be the last marching order to elected officials. Do we really want some bishop in Italy or France or Germany tell our officials how to vote?

I agree with you here. A politician should be able to live a Christian lifestyle but not legislate Christianity. For example, a politician may believe masturbation is sin but not believe in passing a law against it.

On a separate topic---what Bible are these people reading to get these ideas? Jesus made a point of welcoming sinners; Judas was invited to the Last Supper. Using communion as a weapon is about as unchristian as you can get.

You are off-target here. Jesus called people to repentance, not to continue in their sins. And St. Paul indicates coming to the Lord's table unworthily has spiritual consequences. Communion should only be offered to those in good standing with the church. If someone is harboring sin they should abstain. If the clergy know of unrepented sin in someone's life, they should not offer communion to the person.

65 posted on 04/26/2004 7:36:49 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: narses
After the election, Bentley told the San Diego Union-Tribune that Maher's letter to Killea made the difference. "In one letter," the defeated candidate said, "he created an instant international celebrity and a martyr."
66 posted on 04/26/2004 7:37:02 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Yours is one view, Deacon Sinkspur's the other (and clearly the one being used by the leaders of the USCCB). It looks like the Vatican is getting ready to bring the USCCB to heel over this issue. (Or is that heal?)
67 posted on 04/26/2004 7:37:10 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: narses
JFKerry's PUBLIC taking of a heretical and blasphemous psuedo-communion at the AME Church the Sunday before Easter should have been enough for them.

Yep.

68 posted on 04/26/2004 7:37:29 PM PDT by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The only issue the bishops have harped on in the last ten years is abortion

The bishops spend far more time harping on "peace and justice" and capital punishment and other democrat party issues than abortion, and you know it, Sink. This statement of yours is nonsense. Go scan through the USCCB documents and see.

 

Alphabetical Listing
of Statements & Speeches

Chronological Listing
Subject Listing


January 14, 2004 Copyright © by United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
69 posted on 04/26/2004 7:39:56 PM PDT by Polycarp IV (PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic--without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Facts are your friend Deacon. Once more, the THREE facts you tried to ignore:
Killea's win was no landslide, ...

Kerry has NO CHANCE of a landslide.

...she outspent her opponent nearly three-to-one, ...

GW can and will outspend Monsiuer Carrie.

...and the college of bishops showed little collegiality toward Bishop Maher at the time."

And the Bishops are being told by ROME to get a backbone. Your one, puny little example crumbles Deacon.

70 posted on 04/26/2004 7:40:06 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lnbjohnson
AFAIK, Monsieur Carrie is not trying to create a new church, but if he wants to, let him go.
71 posted on 04/26/2004 7:41:24 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: narses
My puny little fact is the opinion of the losing candidate.

The fact that Killea won is proof enough that Maher's action was ineffective, and very likely provided the margin of victory.

It certainly didn't help, did it?

72 posted on 04/26/2004 7:42:08 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp IV
What are the American bishops known for, in the minds of the electorate?

Certainly not for immigration reform.

73 posted on 04/26/2004 7:43:19 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: narses
The godless moral depravity and decadence of American culture already produced eight years of the clinton madness. I may happen again. What should not happen is the Catholic Church collapsing on such a grave issue. Kerry may win anyway. But KICK HIM OUT. Don't let him be "Catholic" and pro-death. He's a kook and a moral moron. A barbarian.

The bishops should also investigate and render a canonical judgment on this Skull&Bones cult he belongs to at Yale. It meets the usual criteria on dangerous, anti-Christian secret societies which promote a secular humanist totalitarian anti-Catholic ideology.

74 posted on 04/26/2004 7:43:47 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Deny Kerry the Eucharist on the first day of Advent, 2004.

But, not during this election season.

Do you want to see Kerry elected on the back of a delayed action by the American bishops?"

I would rather see the American bishops follow Church teaching and the Vatican ( the right and moral thing ).
Kerry has been notified to cease his actions, and is obviously unrepentant. What compounds this is the obvious attempt to drum up support by pointing the finger at those 'evil, mean bishops ', who happen to be the shepherds of the Church of which Kerry claims to be a devout member.

I suspect that even non-Catholics would understand if the bishops did the right thing.

75 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:18 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
"Did his refusal not backfire?"

Nope, not really. But more important, did the Sacramento Bishop create a backlash favoring Grey Davis? Your claim is that denial will create a backlash, the Bishop took a very public and principled stand (thank God for faithful Bishops) and the public accepted that. It was over ABORTION Deacon, in California, a battleground state. Your 'analysis', staked on a decades old legislative race, pales when compared to a statewide, recent race.

This is a critical debate and I appreciate very much your clearly mainstream view. The FACTS though are against you.
76 posted on 04/26/2004 7:45:49 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
The bishops should also investigate and render a canonical judgment on this Skull&Bones cult he belongs to at Yale. It meets the usual criteria on dangerous, anti-Christian secret societies which promote a secular humanist totalitarian anti-Catholic ideology.

It's a goofy college club.

You're a bit of a conspiracist, aren't you, what with your major suspicions of Masons and other like groups?

77 posted on 04/26/2004 7:46:24 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
I suspect that even non-Catholics would understand if the bishops did the right thing.

Are you willing to bet a hundred dollars on that, tonight?

I'm not.

78 posted on 04/26/2004 7:47:29 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Did his refusal not backfire?

Whose refusal? Certainly not Bishop Wiegand, which was more a rebuke than a refusal. Even Bishop Maher's refusal may not have actually helped the winning candidate much.

But, you see, I'm not looking at this from a political perspective.

What I am concerned about is this ongoing refusal of the U.S. bishops to simply teach the Catholic faith. When they have to have a committee to decide if one can be pro-abortion and still be admitted to Holy Communion, it sends a confusing message to those who would be tempted to think that one can be Catholic and pro-abortion.

It may cause some who may lean in that direction to adhere to groups like CFFC, CTA or FutureChurch, because they aren't hearing a clear and unequivocal message that such groups are outside the Church.

I only ask the bishops to have the same ability to enforce discipline as they show with traditional Catholics who dare prefer the ancient Order of Mass. They never seem to have a problem with "pastoral concerns" in that area.

79 posted on 04/26/2004 7:47:39 PM PDT by B Knotts (Just another medieval Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp IV
Lay Ecclesial Ministry: The State of the Questions

Grrrrr.

80 posted on 04/26/2004 7:49:59 PM PDT by B Knotts (Just another medieval Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson