Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch
Having a GOP leadership is important, but not fundamentally so.

If the choice was between a Democrat leadership, without Specter, or a Republican Leadership, with Specter, which would be better?

Given that Specter would be part of that leadership, and would, in fact, be chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I see very little difference.

There are a few other RINOs in the Senate. But none of them would have the influence that Specter would, were he re-elected.

So while I might argue that we need to support other RINOs, simply to retain the majority, I will not do that, with Specter, because a Republican leadership with him running the Judiciary Committee is not better than a Democrat leadership.

65 posted on 04/26/2004 1:55:21 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: jdege
Well Specter will keep the Senate with a Republican majority until the November election, unless he is no bitter about being voted out by his own party that he finally becomes a Democrat. But even still it would be a tie, and Dick Cheney would cast the deciding vote.

I think Toomy can win in November, and though it's not a sure thing, nothing ventured, nothing gained.

I also fully expect Republicans to pick up several seats in November, including Boxer's in California.


75 posted on 04/26/2004 2:02:20 PM PDT by counterpunch (<-CLICK HERE for my CARTOONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson