[MplsSteve]

A "Conservatives for Hoeffel" committee?

Nice job there Josh of cutting off your nose to spite your face!

[NittanyLion]

Out of curiousity, are you backing Specter or Toomey in this primary?

[Josh in PA]

It's simple..

If it looks clear the GOP will hold onto majority in the Senate..

What would you rather have.. 53 seats with liberal, pro-abortion Spector chairing Judiciary Committee with all the Supreme Court nominess coming up.. Spector already torpedoed Bush's appelate court nominees, he'll do the same again. Spector, in his last term, is also quite possible to do a switch similar to Jeffords did. So the edge would remain the same.

Or would you rather hold 52 seats, with true conservative Jon Kyl chairing the Judiciary Committee?


Which one of the two scenarios advances the conservative agenda the most? No brainer, the ladder.

I'll fight to hell and back to make sure Spector is destroyed in November..

I'l encourage Hoeffel support, as well as support of the other 3rd party candidate.


My #1 objective right now is to end the career of Arlen Spector, and if it doesn't happen tomorrow, we will go all-out in the fall to do it.

[Badray]

"Nice job there Josh of cutting off your nose to spite your face!"

Nah, more like willing to take a punch in the mouth because it's worth it to get Specter out of the Senate and away from the Judiciary Committee and the Appropriations Committee (he's 2nd in line for that).Can you imagine the spending that he'll do then?

One small step backwards for Republicans. One giant leap forward for conservatism.

[zbigreddogz]

Indeed. I'm kinda torn on this. I support Toomey, it's not nearly as simple of a question as many people think.

However, if need be, Specter in the general. Even a chairman Specter is better then a chairman Lehey.