Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
That is, we are being blackmailed into Sharon's camp, abandoning the Palestininans and our role as hoest broker.

Walt, it is impossible to be an honest broker for a cause and a people who consider honesty a weakness. Our policy should be to show the Islamic world, and especially the Arab world, that honesty will be rewarded with good faith but that treachery will result in total humiliation.

43 posted on 04/26/2004 10:41:53 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
That is, we are being blackmailed into Sharon's camp, abandoning the Palestininans and our role as hoest broker.

Walt, it is impossible to be an honest broker for a cause and a people who consider honesty a weakness. Our policy should be to show the Islamic world, and especially the Arab world, that honesty will be rewarded with good faith but that treachery will result in total humiliation.

Not my point. I could care less about the Palestinians.

My point is what does it say about the War on Terror? If we've made a fundamental policy shift after 35 years, why?

Is it because Sharon, a very hard ball player indeed, has said, we will share our intelligence and assets to help you better in the WOT, if you support permanent Jewsh settlements in the West Bank?

If we -need- to concede our position as "honest broker", does that indicate that we are in a fix for info?

I don't know, I am asking. I think that at least implicit in why we did this big policy change. It's scary.

Walt

56 posted on 04/26/2004 1:06:04 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson