Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bogey78O; archy; Travis McGee
This is hard to know. Pre-ban clips usually have no ID markings. To my understanding, unless you have paper proving date of ownership, you may be in violation according to the strictest interpretation of the law.
5 posted on 04/25/2004 7:38:23 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (So what are you expecting from NPR - the truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: WorkingClassFilth
Yea, but magazines made past 1994 that were high cap must have LEO use only or some similar marking on it. Possession of those by noncops is a crime as far as I know. It'd be akin to owning a postban assault weapon (2 evil features and a detachable mag- same case, Lords and Nobles use only). A preban mag has no markings on it but it will sell for 10x the amount generally.
6 posted on 04/25/2004 7:42:53 PM PDT by Bogey78O (I voted for this tagline... before I voted against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson