Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: threat matrix; Pukin Dog; prairiebreeze
I'm thinking this is NOT a good idea to have the president calling the shots. Why isn't the military deciding what is best?
18 posted on 04/25/2004 5:36:21 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
Because the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, not the other way around.
23 posted on 04/25/2004 5:37:45 PM PDT by victoryatallcosts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: All
I read on another thread that the situation is a little different in Falujah than what we are lead to believe. I don't think GWB would go lightly if the situation warrants otherwise. Time will tell on this one.
29 posted on 04/25/2004 5:39:20 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Relax. Drudge is hyping it a little.

The Military did decide this. Bush blessed it. The military determined that they could not guarantee a 'clean' kill, and that civilians would likely die in the assault, providing a propaganda win for the insurgents if any of them were to survive. The Military is actually grateful for this decision, because they now get to just pick off the insurgents one by one, if any of them are dumb enough to pick up a weapon.

We are already getting propaganda from Al Jazerra trying to encourage an attack by suggesting that the insurgents have 'weakened'. Though that is true, they are not weak enough yet, as they would start shooting civilians themselves just to blame those deaths on America. Al Jazerra's cameras are ready and poised to capture those deaths, so we are not going to provide them. Instead, we will just keep shooting the insurgents through the head from sniper rifles, and let the insurgents starve.

47 posted on 04/25/2004 5:45:04 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Nonsense. Civilian leaders often make much better decisions than the "pros" in the military.

Often the pressures of politics relegates strategic military choices to the back of the deck.

The result often confirms the wisdom of that decision.....just ask Roosevelt or Lincoln...

65 posted on 04/25/2004 5:50:35 PM PDT by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
""Why isn't the military deciding what is best?""

Because its not running for re-election.
71 posted on 04/25/2004 5:52:14 PM PDT by Rebelbase ("Kerry is the female version of Hillary"............FReeper Paul Atreides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Why isn't the military deciding what is best?

They generally do, but they have to follow the goal set by the President.

272 posted on 04/25/2004 7:31:15 PM PDT by DiscoStu1979 (Disco Stu Likes Disco Music)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
He's called the commander-in-chief.

He listens to the military, but then the decision is his.

That's the way we want it... or at least I do.

284 posted on 04/25/2004 7:37:35 PM PDT by altura (Sometimes the ground rises up to meet me, but I DON'T FALL DOWN-but if I do, I have a helmet on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peach
Shades of McNamara Peach. Shades of Viet Nam.We have soldiers going AWOL, this is getting messy. We are not there for social development we are there to kill the SOB's. (the bad ones).

I keep thinking back to Patton's line " The idea is to have the other son of a bitch die for his country".

The politics of this war is irritating the hell out of me.


430 posted on 04/26/2004 2:26:07 PM PDT by Iberian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson