To: Hajman
One can also come up with a fair number of ways that this is happening without paranormal activity.Good point. The guy mentioned in my tag line would agree for sure.
49 posted on
04/24/2004 12:54:07 PM PDT by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Paradox
Good point. The guy mentioned in my tag line would agree for sure.
I believe you missed my point. Just because multiple explinations of this even can be explained via paranormal activity doesn't mean one should reject paranormal activity out of hand. Though Occam's razor states that the simplist explination is the most likely to be true, it doesn't state that the simplist explination is true. Sometimes there are just too many coincidences. (In this particular case though, I think the non-paranormal explinations take care of those problems. This story doesn't have any additional elements to convince me of another possibility beyond the natural.)
-The Hajman-
59 posted on
04/24/2004 1:05:17 PM PDT by
Hajman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson