To: Dave S
Given God's demonstrated miraculous affirmations of Paul's life after his conversion . . .
and, as former very hostile atheist Josh McDowell's scholarly assertions that there's better proof than a lot of courts convict murders to death on . . .
I have no trouble accepting Paul's assertions. They were, by the way, quite reasonably close to the events. Perhaps you forget he held Stephen's coat at Stephen's stoning.
101 posted on
04/24/2004 2:37:23 PM PDT by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
Perhaps you forget he held Stephen's coat at Stephen's stoning. Did holding Stephen's coat allow him to see what Stephen saw? Even if it did, it still wouldnt mean it was true, just something that Saul got off of Stephen at that moment in time.
146 posted on
04/24/2004 6:01:57 PM PDT by
Dave S
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson