Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/24/2004 8:58:58 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TheSpottedOwl; saveliberty; Pikachu_Dad; steve-b; JudgemAll
ping
2 posted on 04/24/2004 9:01:45 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
It is a fundamental consideration in setting child support amounts properly, that the amounts are based on what parents are able to provide. When circumstances change, such as loss of employment, timely adjustments need to be made to the amounts they are ordered to pay, so that uncollectable debts don't pile up – as they do now – giving the impression that more collection agents are needed. Custodial parents need to adjust their budgets and spending habits just like married couples and single adults would under similar circumstances. Just because a mother is divorced, doesn't guarantee a particular standard of living.

It won't happen..............it is very rare the systems will adjust payments down when the support paying parent has a change in financial status.

I have no dog in this fight, I have just watched it happen to many people that I know.

4 posted on 04/24/2004 9:14:12 AM PDT by Gabz (Those people with no honor have no idea how to treat honorable people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
As horrible and corrupt as the child support system is, I think it should stay in place for one reason--to encourage men to use birth control.
16 posted on 04/24/2004 9:51:45 AM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
My brother went through some of this. The "mother" shacked up with guy who left his own wife, then sexually molested the 15-year old daughter. The "mother" is still with this creep. And he had to pay child support all through this sordid episode.
18 posted on 04/24/2004 10:01:47 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
Furthermore, if the wife is receiving child support, she should be required to show the court that it went to support the child.

The current system is heavily in favor of women, to put it mildly.
23 posted on 04/24/2004 1:23:44 PM PDT by clyde asbury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay
tom leykis has been providing radio time on this issue.

i'll bet the rad feminists hate his guts!
24 posted on 04/24/2004 1:55:13 PM PDT by no_problema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RogerFGay; hellinahandcart; Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper
"Christo said. "I have lost my car. I have moved my children twice. There are times when I don't know if I'm going to make it to pay day."

Well Beth honey, it is a usual occurrence for me to not "know if I'm going to make it to pay day." I supposedly make "good money" too. Especially since the more than $1000/month that I am paying in "voluntary" child support (my wages are garnished for it even though I was never late with it) is not counted as "income" for the ex-wife. That $1000/month is after-tax income that I get to provide "voluntarily."

Also, there is no tax break for me for this other than the opportunity to claim one of my two children as a tax dependent.

Sorry, honey, I have NO sympathy for you.

Roger, thanks for doing what you do.

25 posted on 04/24/2004 2:58:24 PM PDT by sauropod ("How do you know he's a King?" "Because he doesn't have sh!t all over him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson