Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife
OK .. why did the NYT print this article?

Sure much of it was puff .. but a lot of people didn't know about this part of Kerry's life

By printing this article .. it's now it's wide open for discussion
26 posted on 04/24/2004 12:12:09 AM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1
Hubbard was NEVER in Vietnam. His 2 "wounds" while in the Air Force came from playing hockey and basketball. Source: Stolen Valor.
27 posted on 04/24/2004 12:29:01 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1; clee1; All
Orlando Sentinel***Kerry wants to link U.S. foreign policy to participation in -- and a willingness to be constrained by -- international organizations, such as the United Nations. He gets it from his father, a State Department diplomat who criticized U.S. Cold War policies as blind to world opinion and unreasonably harsh on the Soviet Union.***

CBS News: Kerry's World: Father Knows Best***"Americans," he writes, "are inclined to see the world and foreign affairs in black and white." They celebrate their own form of government and denigrate all others, making them guilty of what he calls "ethnocentric accommodation -- everyone ought to be like us." As a result, America has committed the "fatal error" of "propagating democracy" and fallen prey to "the siren's song of promoting human rights," falsely assuming that our values and institutions are a good fit in the Third World. And, just as Americans exaggerate their own goodness, they exaggerate their enemies' badness. The Soviet Union wasn't nearly as imperialistic as American politicians warned, Kerry argues. "Seeing the Soviet Union as the aggressor in every instance, and the U.S. as only reacting defensively, relieves an American observer from the need to see any parallel between our use of military power in distant parts of the world, and the Soviet use of military power outside the Soviet Union," he writes. He further claims that "Third world Marxist movements were autonomous national movements" -- outside Moscow's orbit. The book culminates in a plea for a hardheaded, realist foreign policy that removes any pretense of U.S. moral superiority.

Despite its blunt arguments, The Star-Spangled Mirror received little attention. Foreign Affairs greeted it with a 90-word summation in its review section. But the work of Richard Kerry, who passed away in 2000, will soon experience posthumous reconsideration. It won't be because of the renewed relevance of his arguments (although his book does read like a contemporary brief against neoconservatism). It will be because his son is a leading candidate to run U.S. foreign policy. ***

28 posted on 04/24/2004 12:33:33 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1
OK .. why did the NYT print this article?

Sure much of it was puff .. but a lot of people didn't know about this part of Kerry's life

By printing this article .. it's now it's wide open for discussion

How eager is the Times to get the word out on Kerry, the Saturday edition, the lowest circulation? All of the most incriminating statements have been verified by other, but less well known, sources. This way they can act like this is all old news. They have good reason to fear Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry.

30 posted on 04/24/2004 12:51:02 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1
"By printing this article .. it's now it's wide open for discussion"

The Saturday Slimes has a lower circulation then "Leprosy Quarterly"

44 posted on 04/24/2004 9:47:32 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (60 Senate seats changes America. Who is your Senator?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson