Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36; backhoe; THX 1138; NJJ; FL_engineer; Starve The Beast; prairiebreeze; ...
Reverse GorelickBUMP
32 posted on 04/24/2004 5:46:10 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
Voice of America, 4 September 1995
TEXT: TODAY'S "WASHINGTON POST," NOTES THAT THE NATIONALLY-KNOWN FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, REPUBLICAN THOMAS KEAN, HAS DECLINED TO RUN FOR THE SENATE SEAT BEING VACATED BY DEMOCRAT BILL BRADLEY. MR. KEAN CITED WHAT HE CALLED THE "LACK OF CIVILITY AND MEANNESS" IN NATIONAL POLITICS, BUT "THE POST" QUESTIONS HIS DECISION:
VOICE: "MR. KEAN MAY HAVE COMPELLING PERSONAL REASONS FOR NOT WANTING TO RUN FOR OFFICE IN 1996, A YEAR IN WHICH SHARP POLARIZATION IN WASHINGTON COULD SPILL OVER INTO A NASTY CAMPAIGN. BUT IF HE AND OTHER REPUBLICANS LIKE HIM DON'T LIKE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THEIR PARTY, THEY SHOULDN'T RUN FROM THE FIGHT OVER ITS FUTURE BUT GET INTO IT."

REMARKS BY CONGRESSMAN GEORGE E. BROWN, JR.
Snip...Much of this upheaval seems unthinking, driven simply by a desire to reduce the budget and eliminate Federal programs and agencies. Former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean, in explaining his reasons for not seeking the Republican nomination for Senate in that state, said recently, "If the whole priority is just reducing the budget, you're just crunching numbers and you don't have a guiding philosophy and that's not governing." The absence of a policy debate on this guiding philosophy, which in the Science Committee translates into the lack of a full discussion on science policy, is the most unsettling part of the current political process.

33 posted on 04/24/2004 6:16:28 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
And let's not forget who was in China in '95...

Mr. Thomas Kean of the United States during a press conference at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China. Credit: UN/DPI 140834/Chen Kai Xing

34 posted on 04/24/2004 6:19:53 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Do any remember this?
http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu
A PANEL OF HOPE
Snip...John Hope Franklin, James B. Duke Professor emeritus of history, was named by President Clinton to chair a seven-member advisory panel to examine race relations in America.
Snip...Joining Franklin on the panel will be former governors Thomas Kean of New Jersey and William Winter of Mississippi; Linda Chavez-Thompson, executive vice president of the AFL-CIO; The Reverend Suzan Johnson Cook; Angela Oh, a Los Angeles attorney and community leader; and Robert Thompson, the CEO of Nissan U.S.A.
35 posted on 04/24/2004 6:26:11 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
A house divided cannot stand
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | April 25, 2004 | Zell Miller


Posted on 04/25/2004 2:44:13 PM PDT by Hildy


Finger-pointing before 9/11 panel is hurting nation, helping foes

By Zell Miller
April 25, 2004

Finger-pointing before 9/11 panel is hurting nation, helping foes

After watching the harsh acrimony generated by the September 11 Commission – which, let me say at the outset, is made up of good and able members – I've come to seriously question this panel's usefulness. I believe it will ultimately play a role in doing great harm to this country, for its unintended consequences, I fear, will be to energize our enemies and demoralize our troops.

After being drowned in a tidal wave of all who didn't do enough before 9/11, I have come to believe that the commission should issue a report that says: "No one did enough in the past. No one did near enough."

Then thank everyone for serving, send them home and let's get on with the job of protecting this country in the future. Tragically, these hearings have proved to be a very divisive diversion for this country. Tragically, they have devoured valuable time, looking backward when we should be looking forward.

Can you imagine handling the attack on Pearl Harbor this way? Can you imagine Congress, the media and the public standing for this kind of political gamesmanship and finger-pointing after that "day of infamy" in 1941? Some partisans tried that ploy, but they were soon quieted by the patriots who understood how important it was to get on with the war and take the battle to America's enemies, and not dwell on what FDR knew when.

You see, back then the highest priority was to win a war, not win an election. That's what made them "The Greatest Generation."

I realize that many well-meaning Americans see the hearings as "democracy in action." Years ago, when I was teaching political science, I probably would have had my class watching it live on television and using that very phrase with them.

There are also the not-so-well-meaning political operatives who see these hearings as an opportunity to score cheap points. Then, there are the Media Meddlers who see this as great theater that can be played out on the evening news and on endless talk shows for a week or more. Congressional hearings have long been one of Washington's most entertaining pastimes. Joe McCarthy. Watergate. Iran Contra. They all kept us glued to the TV, and made for conversation around the water coolers and arguments over a beer at the corner pub.

A congressional hearing in Washington, D.C. is the ultimate aphrodisiac for political groupies and partisan punks. But, it's not the groupies, punks and television-sotted American public that I'm worried about.

No, it is the real enemies of America that I'm concerned about. These evil killers who right now are gleefully watching the shrill partisan finger-pointing of these hearings and grinning like a mule eating briars.

They see this as a major split within the Great Satan America. They see anger, they see division, instability, bickering, peevishness and dissension. They see the president of the United States hammered unmercifully. They see all this and they are greatly, greatly encouraged.

We should not be doing anything to encourage our enemies in this battle between good and evil. Yet, these hearings, in my opinion, are doing just that.

We are playing with fire. We're playing directly into the hands of our enemy by allowing these hearings to become the great divider they have become.

Dick Clarke's book and its release coinciding with these hearings have done this country a tremendous disservice, and someday we will reap its whirlwind. Long ago, Sir Walter Scott observed that revenge is "the sweetest morsel that ever was cooked in hell." The vindictive Clarke has now had his revenge, but what kind of hell has he, his CBS publisher and his axe-to-grind advocates unleashed?

These hearings, coming on the heels of the election the terrorists influenced in Spain, bolster and energize our evil enemies as they have not been energized since 9/11.


Chances are very good that these evil enemies of America will attempt to influence our 2004 election in a similar dramatic way as they did Spain's. And to think that could never be in this country is to stick your head in the sand.

That is why the sooner we stop this endless bickering over the past and join together to prepare for the future, the better off this country will be. There are some things – whether the city of Washington believes it or not – that are just more important than political campaigns.

The recent past is so ripe for political second-guessing "gotcha" and Monday morning quarter-backing. And it is so tempting in an election year. We should not allow ourselves to indulge that temptation. We should put our country first.

Every administration from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush bears some of the blame. Dick Clarke bears a big heap of it because it was he who was in the catbird's seat to do something about it for more than a decade. Tragically, it was the decade in which we did the least.

We did nothing after terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in 1993, killing six and injuring more than 1,000 Americans.

We did nothing in 1996 when 16 U.S. servicemen were killed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers.

When our embassies were attacked in 1998, killing 263 people, our only response was to fire a few missiles on an empty tent.


Is it any wonder that after that decade of weak-willed responses to that murderous terror, our enemies thought we would never fight back?

In the 1990s is when Dick Clarke should have resigned. In the 1990s is when he should have apologized. That is when he should have written his book. That is, if he really had America's best interest at heart.


Some will say, "We owe it to the families" to get more information about what happened in the past and I can understand that. But no amount of finger-pointing will bring our victims back. So, now we owe it to future families and all of America now in jeopardy not to encourage more terrorists, resulting in even more grieving families, perhaps many more than the ones of 9/11.

It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into two camps: the wimps and the warriors.

The ones who want to argue and assess and appease, and the ones who want to carry this fight to our enemies and kill them before they kill us. And, in case you haven't figured it out, I proudly belong to the latter.

This is a time like no other in the history of this country, and this country is being crippled with petty partisan politics of the worst possible kind. In time of war, it is not just unpatriotic; it is stupid, and it is criminal.

So, I pray that all this time, all this energy, all this talk and all this attention could be focused on the future instead of the past.

I pray we would stop pointing fingers, assigning blame and wringing our hands about what happened on that day David McCullogh has called "the worst day in our history" more than two years ago. And instead, pour all of our energy into how we can kill these terrorists before they kill us – again.

For make no mistake. They watch these hearings. They are scheming and smiling about the distraction and the divisiveness they see in America. And while they may not know who said it years ago in America, they know instinctively that a house divided cannot stand.

There is one other group that we should remember is listening to all of this – our troops.

I was in Iraq in January and one day when I was meeting with the 1st Armored Division, a unit with a proud history known as Old Ironsides, we were discussing troop morale, and the commanding general said it was top notch.


And I turned to the division's sergeant major, the top enlisted man in the division, a big, burly, 6-foot-3, 240-pound African-American. And I said, "That's good, but how do you sustain that kind of morale?"

Without hesitation he narrowed his eyes, and he looked at me and said "The morale will stay high just as long as these troops know the people back home support us."

Just as long as the people back home support us. What kind of message are these hearings and the outrageously political speeches on the floor of the Senate sending to those marvelous young Americans in the uniform of our country?


I say, unite America! Before it is too late! Put aside these petty partisan differences when it comes to the protection of our people. Argue and argue and argue and debate and debate and debate over all the other things – jobs and education and the deficit and the environment – but please, please do not use the lives of Americans and the security of this country as a cheap-shot political talking point.

Miller, a Democrat, is the senior U.S. senator from Georgia. This commentary was taken from recent remarks Miller delivered on the Senate floor.


45 posted on 04/25/2004 4:34:52 PM PDT by truth4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson