Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Since some of what is called "art" is cr*p like Jesus on a crucifix in a jar of urine, naked lesbians smearing chocolate on themselves or inviting the audience to look at their private parts with a speculum, a picture of the Virgin Mary decorated with elephant dung and pictures of female genitalia, I am in agreement with the concept of censorship.

How about taking the first step and not have the government subsidize this psuedo-art? I can't wait for the Republicans to get control of the House, Senate and White House so the NRA will be defunded.

35 posted on 04/23/2004 9:05:17 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. - Ann Coulter 4/1/04, How 9-11 Happened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio
You mean the NEA - National Endowment for the "Arts"?

If the gov't reduced spending by at least 50%, it would be a good start.

Who in heck would spend personal money for any of this sick cr*p anyway? The so-called artists would then have to make stuff regular people like, or take up farming or car repair, or something else productive and useful.
36 posted on 04/23/2004 9:12:04 PM PDT by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson