I have no problem with his post Vietnam life being torn apart.
What I am seeing here is "conservatives" denigrate Kerry's service. Wooo paper cut wound - he got a medal for saving someone's life??? He does not deserve that! etc. This from so called Republicans? Did I land on Bizzarro world?
2. His behavior prior to going to Viet Nam leads me to believe that he enlisted in the Navy because he thought it was safer than the Army. There is no doubt that until the swift boat mission was changed, he wasn't any where near combat.
3. Please remember that HE is the one who has chosen to bring this issue front and center.
4. His testimony before the Senate is the worst part of this whole episode. I do not believe it was done because he was demoralized. He FIRST attempted to run for Congress as a war hero. When that didn't work, he THEN became anti-war.
The guy is a phony. If you wish to disassociate yourself from people who are pointing this out, so be it. But no one is denigrating Viet Nam vets, nor Kerry's service. I certainly won't criticize shrapnel wounds. BUT, at least let the guy be honest and say that they WERE shrapnel wounds, rather than acting like he took bullets and kept on fighting.