Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
This is the guy turning out "new" rapide powerplants:Terry Prince Classic Motorbikes clmotorbikes@hawknet.com.au

As for the '72 XLH/XLCH hitting 1000cc's, I don't really think it was a big improvement. I had a '72 and I borrowed a friend's '69 "900" for a spin. Really didn't see or feel much of a difference.

Indian may have been better served (hindsight, surely) if they had absorbed Crocker's Indian OHV conversion business and incorporated it into their own model lines way back in the '30s. Too bad HD had some part in crushing Crocker (by messing with parts suppliers Crocker was dealing with rumor has it)before it MAY have made the jump beyond custom "to-order" and into regular mass production. They had a unit V-Twin that could outrun most Indians and HD models at the time according to what I've read of testing they did. Of course, the fact that Crockers were being sold at a loss didn't help. Their speedway motors were also not performing on the level that cheaper JAP motors were.

Have a great weekend....signing off.

243 posted on 04/23/2004 2:49:57 PM PDT by Range Rover (Greenpeace is a cult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Range Rover
As for the '72 XLH/XLCH hitting 1000cc's, I don't really think it was a big improvement.

I agree, that and the fact that HD was going to become part of AMF was the reason I kept my '68XLCH. Besides, I already had "Sportster Leg" and could cold-kick start mine on a 30deg. day at Ft. Lewis, Wash.

257 posted on 04/23/2004 4:29:09 PM PDT by elbucko (Never give a Rice Burner an even break.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson