Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
I am very familiar with the Vincent. There was a BSA dealer in San Pedro, CA, that serviced them. I had the occasion to ride a few. They are excellent for the years they were built, but by the time the Sportster came along, the "Vinnie" was out of production. It is a comparison that cannot be fairly made and do equal justice to both examples.
218 posted on 04/23/2004 1:54:31 PM PDT by elbucko (Never give a Muslim an even break.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: elbucko
I am very familiar with the Vincent. There was a BSA dealer in San Pedro, CA, that serviced them. I had the occasion to ride a few. They are excellent for the years they were built, but by the time the Sportster came along, the "Vinnie" was out of production. It is a comparison that cannot be fairly made and do equal justice to both examples.

Only in the sense that Indian was tinkering with a 100cc OHV *sport version* circa 1950, with H-D's flathead 750cc K Sportster not to come along until 1952, with the 883cc/55-inch OHV XL Sportster engine eventually introduced in 1957. It wasn't until 1972 that the 1000cc Ironhead Sportster engine was offered by the factory, Indian having only been ahead of the Milwaukee engineering team by 20 years.

As with the rear suspension on the big Indians that appeared in '46, not to show up on FLH Harletys until 1958, Indian was ahead on engineering points as usual. Pricey, but if they'd only been offered and available, Harley might have made some of their changes sooner, too

233 posted on 04/23/2004 2:26:56 PM PDT by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson