Replies

Some people would rather get rid of Specter than to get Bush's judicial nominees confirmed. It's more fun to carp from the minority side than to govern from the majority.

127 posted on 04/23/2004 10:39:41 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)

To: Doctor Stochastic

LOL. Lot of truth to what you say. ;-)

128 posted on 04/23/2004 10:54:07 PM PDT by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)

To: Gracey; Doctor Stochastic; Common Tator

"As usual, you make so much sense."

It looks like CT has some admirers. Not many. Not from PA. Not familiar with the state of politics in PA any more than CT and without any more relevence to this discussion than CT.

Some Republicans are just plain ~~illogical~~principled>.

I've corrected your premise and/or spelling.

While this is the most important race because of it's implications, it's not the ONLY race for the senate. The dems have to win 8 of their 10 seats (IIRC) that are open to take control of the senate again. It ain't gonna happen. Besides, it's better to have 52 pub senators and Kyl chairing the Judiciary Committee than to have 53 pub senators and Specter there to thwart the conservative judicial nominations (and be next in line for the Appropriations Committee).

140 posted on 04/24/2004 1:01:30 PM PDT by Badray (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown. RIP harpseal.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794