Skip to comments.
Sacked for photo Americans weren't meant to see
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| 23 April
| Caroline Overington
Posted on 04/22/2004 6:41:31 PM PDT by Washington1980
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Washington1980
I don't think the images are offensive. I was impressed with the respect shown these American heros.
2
posted on
04/22/2004 6:49:13 PM PDT
by
tuckrdout
(Terri Schindler (Schiavo) deserves to have her wishes honored: Give her a DIVORCE!)
To: tuckrdout
It sounds like the woman who took the pics was impressed, too. I dont think she did it because she was Rachel Corrie like. It sounds like she appreciated the reverence. That is of course, just my opinion..
3
posted on
04/22/2004 6:53:17 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
To: Washington1980
This isn't offensive as John Kerry calling American soldiers fighting and dying in Vietnam, "assassins", while he was acting like a jackass with his own kind in the US.
4
posted on
04/22/2004 6:54:03 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
To: tuckrdout
The dignity offered those souls was inspiring. I hope that we are taking care of their loved ones as well in their grief and pain.
5
posted on
04/22/2004 6:54:07 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(Woof, scratch and cover!)
To: Thebaddog
I agree. I was not offended by the photographs. It reminded me that freedom isn't free. It also demonstrated the courage of our young men and women who serve our Country and what a real "band of brothers" looks like.
God Bless those souls who have given us the greatest sacrifice to keep us free.
Also, I frankly feel that we should post those scenes from 9/11 to remind each American, each and every day, why we are fighting in Iraqi and why strength lies in power over evil.
6
posted on
04/22/2004 7:04:21 PM PDT
by
not2worry
To: cardinal4
It sounds like the woman who took the pics was impressed, too. I dont think she did it because she was Rachel Corrie like. It sounds like she appreciated the reverence. That is of course, just my opinion..Well, it's the securing an agent and demanding $1400 a printing for the photograph that I have a problem with, if her motives were so pure.
To: Washington1980
On Wednesday Ms Silicio engaged an agent, who offered her photograph to newspaper outlets for $1400 for one-time, non-exclusive use. This is the part that I have a BIG problem with...profiting off of the dead is repugnant at best...she should be horsewhipped.
8
posted on
04/22/2004 7:05:50 PM PDT
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: pseudo-ignatius
Beat me to it by mere seconds. See post #8. I agree with you 100%
9
posted on
04/22/2004 7:06:40 PM PDT
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: Washington1980
from the Seattle Times:
"Her job put her in contact with soldiers who sometimes accompanied the coffins to the airport. Having lost one of her own sons to a brain tumor, Silicio said, she tried to offer support to those grieving over a lost comrade.
"It kind of helps me to know what these mothers are going through, and I try to watch over their children as they head home," she said in an earlier interview."
I can imagine that type of association - good people, especially those who have parented well, go out of their way to help and protect when they can...
10
posted on
04/22/2004 7:06:45 PM PDT
by
bitt
To: pseudo-ignatius
Well, it's the securing an agent and demanding $1400 a printing for the photograph that I have a problem with, if her motives were so pure. I am with you on this.
Even more offensive to me is this story, as I am sure the intent is Bush is hiding the dead, when in truth this is US policy and has been for years. The media knows this.
11
posted on
04/22/2004 7:08:50 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
To: Young Rhino
"The Times received Silicio's photograph from a stateside friend, Amy Katz, who had previously worked with Silicio for a different contractor in Kosovo. Silicio then gave The Times permission to publish it, without compensation. It was paired with an article about her work in Kuwait."
sounds like the friend is the culprit
12
posted on
04/22/2004 7:09:26 PM PDT
by
bitt
To: bitt
Original publication is one thing. Engaging an agent and charging for subsequent publication is quite another. What was perhaps innocent at first became tainted with greed...blood money. I reiterate, she should be horsewhipped. In Texas, she'd probably be tarred and feathered...if she was lucky.
13
posted on
04/22/2004 7:13:29 PM PDT
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: cardinal4
I don't even agree with the Pentagon policy, but this woman is a lying sack of crap. She knew the policy, took the picture anyway, and sold it for profit.
She's vile.
14
posted on
04/22/2004 7:16:09 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Washington1980
She was trusted by her employers and she broke the rules in the most basic kind of way. The photos didn't just accidentally slip out. She broke her trust and deserved to be fired.
Moreover, I don't think anyone could be stupid enough to imagine that the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, a notorious left-wing rag, would print this picture in the spirit of patriotism.
15
posted on
04/22/2004 7:17:32 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: dead
Yeah, you guys are right, I didnt think about the money. The appreciation of their treatment comment was probably thought of AFTER she got fired..
16
posted on
04/22/2004 7:18:28 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
To: Thebaddog
The dignity offered those souls was inspiring.
17
posted on
04/22/2004 7:18:57 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Washington1980
She'd better stay in Seattle because if she ventures out into the red states she's going to find herself a very unpopular and unwanted person.
If a family member wants to share a photo of THEIR soldier, that's their business, it's not for some creep like this to make a buck off of.
Talk about a sleazy, disgusting human being!
18
posted on
04/22/2004 7:19:07 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing.)
To: All; Cicero
Moreover, I don't think anyone could be stupid enough to imagine that the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, a notorious left-wing rag, would print this picture in the spirit of patriotism.I should have thought of that, too..
19
posted on
04/22/2004 7:19:24 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
To: FreedomCalls
In my opinion, the US media should be broadcasting the caskets, funerals, etc. in order to cause people in America to be more connected to those who fall. So that the soldiers are not just a number. At least, that is how it is in Israel.
20
posted on
04/22/2004 7:20:34 PM PDT
by
yonif
("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson