Why Kerry Will Win (Joseph Farah Warns History Is Repeating Itself All Over Again)

Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 04/21/04 | Joseph Farah

[Gracey]

Gee, and I'm a South Park Republican

[ABG(anybody but Gore)]

Gee, and I'm a South Park Republican

Me too. ;^)

[ThePythonicCow]

So, I guess, yeah, I have a problem with his objectivity.

You could well be right. I don't have strong feelings or knowledge of Joseph Farah either way.

[backhoe]

We have to fight like we're behind and we're gonna lose the election.

Absolutely- I think President Bush will win- Kerry is an especially noisome candidate- but I fear this will be a more bitter, and closer election than 2000 was.

[driftless]

We should remember that Joe Farah also predicted the end of the world a few years ago. I believe he wrote a column insisting that we were the "end times" as he put it. And that stuff about Bush not supporting the constitution is rubbish. Farah desparages a prez who is killing those who want to kill us. But even the best presidents make mistakes. Farah reveals more about himself in these ridiculous statements.

Of course Kerry could win. Nothing is beyond the realm of possibility. But then why is Kerry slipping in the polls with many things seeming to go bad for Bush? I think many Americans are looking at Kerry closely and not liking what they see. I'd bet on Bush.

[Benrand]

Yeah, Ichabod could pick someone new and invigorating for his VP slot.

He could go the route of out-of-the-box thinking and grab a woman...well, Geraldine Ferraro didn't help.

He should go to the guy that's been SO reliable to the Democrat party...Frank Lautenberg.

[ThePythonicCow]

If Effin's elected, we won't have to get on a boat to outsource ourselves. We can stay right where we are and still be a stranger in a strange land.

[Dane]

The man is a legend in his own mind. His psychic powers abound in his own little brain

Farah does have an arrogant smugness with his writing and probably the reason for my visceral reatcion to his visceral writing. I can't believe that he completely left out the Perot factor in 92 and Dukakis's lead in 88 out of his own self proclaimed clairvoyance for 04.

I to don't believe that 04 will be a landslide(who knows it could be), but again JMO, things don't get serious until after Labor day and a lot of things can happen between now and Nov. 2nd on both sides.

[AntiGuv]

Yep, it'll create some transient excitement but I can't see that the VP choice will make any real difference, unless it's the most unlikely of possibilities - a Republican.

[Dahoser]

Unlike 2000 and like 1992, the partisan media are solidly behind the RATs and against the Bush in the White House. Where they beat the crap out of Gore after the debates, they fell and continue to fall all over anything Clinton. (Or is that kneel in front of?) They're doing the same with Kerry.

There are two differences, one in our favor, one not.

In Our Favor
W does not have most of his father's RINO and arrogant advisors. Rich Bond and Mary Matalin are not working the campaign; Charlie Black, whose clueless arrogance stunk up many a media appearance against a Clintonista in 1992, is to some degree and that's worrisome. It's in our favor, but only to the extent that these folks and their ilk are kept far, far away.

Not In Our Favor
In 1992, the media should have been paid for the role they played in electing America's first black President. Yet, they were doing what they normally did with just a bit more gusto. Twelve years, 537 votes in Florida, the internet and Fox News later, they know they still retain immense power even if it's being eaten away, and are actively applying it against W. That's why you see Viacom's Simon and Shuster anti-W books being promoted as gospel on Viacom's 60 Minutes. The partisan media are not going to savage Kerry as they did Gore---unless Her Heinous needs it for her ascension. Either way, when CFR kicks in, they're going to be one continuous RAT advertisement.

[highlander_UW]

Or perhaps someone will realize that he's an admitted war criminal and attended a vote to assassinate senators and he will be arrested and put away for his crimes.

[highlander_UW]

Absolutely- I think President Bush will win- Kerry is an especially noisome candidate- but I fear this will be a more bitter, and closer election than 2000 was.

Ahhh...geee...if so, can someone please teach the democrats that this is a REPUBLIC and not a democracy? I don't know if I can stomach another 4 years of whining about vote counts because they don't understand how our government works.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

Nobody likes Kerry. But outside of FR, I never hear much good being said of Bush anymore.

Hopefully, this is just a local phenomenom, but those who supported him in 2000 don't seem to care anymore.

[hershey]

Hmm, true, the media will turn Kerry's nomination into the Second Coming, but this am, the Secret Service says Boston police don't have enough resources to do the job protecting the RAT convention in July. It won't look good if MA has to deploy the national guard around the convention center, et. al. Maybe they'll draft cops from around the state to help out. I do think that terrorists are planning something nasty for us before Nov.. Hopefully, we'll catch them way before they carry out their plots.

[garylmoore]

Farah is all wet and so are you. We have reason to be overconfident, just look at the character of who we are backing compared to what is running against him, people are seeing right through this phony and I don't care how far they lift him up at the convention or how much the lefties connive to get him elected, our President will prevail and you can take that to the bank, I rest my case.

[boris]

"everyone bounces after their convention... even Al Gore did"

Was that the Buddhist convention?...

[Oldeconomybuyer]

...This is my prediction. Mark it down. Remember where you heard it...

OK. This is my prediction. Political pundits and public opinion polls do not adequately account for the post-911 mood of voters. They missed the 2002 election and will likely miss again this year.

During a time of war America will not elect an appeaser. The election will again be close, but Kerry has painted himself into a corner with the extreme left and cannot afford to flip-flop on his anti-war rhetoric.

Bush wins.

[dawn53]

As far as Clinton and Kerry being anything alike, that's laughable. Clinton didn't get the title of "slick" because he was dull, boring, and prone to gaffes.

On the other hand, to compare 1992 to 2004 is idiotic.

Has Farah ever heard the phrase "it's the economy stupid" or does he even remember a fellow named Ross Perot?

[Gorzaloon]

That's a big part of why I think Bush will win - Kerry's just too repellant. Had it been Gephardt or Edwards or Graham or Clark or Lieberman he would've probably lost.

You really have something there. I was positive that even though I despised Clinton, and had nothing but contempt for him, were I to have met him for 15 minutes, I would probably have come away liking him, as a "lovable rogue". That was his talent.

Kerry is not JFK, nor Clinton. Nor much of anything, moment to moment.

[RobFromGa]

It gives me no pleasure to make this prediction. While I believe Bush has been a failure as a president in many ways and cannot support him for re-election, I know Kerry will prove disastrous for the country.

The voice of a reasoned thoughtful man. Not. Either that or he never grew up.

Would the USA be a better country if every single citizen believed in the Constitution, wanted the government to butt out, and for people to be responsible for themselves? Of course. Do most Americans think this way? Not enough yet.

They need to be weaned from the government over time. SocSec and Medicare will be reformed in term 2. Very possibly structural tax changes will occur in term 2.

And most importantly the WoT will be advanced in term 2.

For Farah to not vote for Bush is disgusting in light of the fact that he knows what a "disaster" Kerry will be. For Farah to try to influence others of the rightness of his stupid path is even more reprehensible. What is the alternative he proposes other than a magic wand and some pixie dust? He needs to rejoin reality.

WorldNetDaily, nice to have known you.