Skip to comments.
PLAN OF ... SALES (WOODWARD BOOK)
New York Post ^
| 4/21/04
| JOHN PODHORETZ
Posted on 04/21/2004 12:40:06 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:20:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
April 21, 2004 -- BOB Woodward has misled the nation! In the run-up to the publication of his new book, "Plan of Attack," he sexed up his own intelligence findings! Quick, convene a panel at the Columbia Journalism School!
How did Woodward deceive the audience of "60 Minutes" and the entire press corps? He made people believe "Plan of Attack" rivaled Richard Clarke's bestseller in Bush-bashing - by pulling out a few isolated sentences from the book's endless 465 pages to make it appear as though "Plan" were a startling indictment of the war in Iraq.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; bookreview; planofattack; podhoretz
1
posted on
04/21/2004 12:40:07 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
A book that is on the White House site as suggested reading is hardly red meat for the dems.
2
posted on
04/21/2004 12:53:20 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: kattracks
So what if he distorted the contents of his own book? He knows perfectly well that nobody actually reads him. ROFLOL!
3
posted on
04/21/2004 1:25:25 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: MEG33
I think the fact that the White House site links to the book is sheer genius.
Absolutely takes all the wind out of the sails of the anti-Bush crowd. Deflates the theory that the Woodward book has "secret" info on the President and his administration that they didn't want the public to know.
What Bush-basher will fork out $30 to buy a book that the White House is recommending, much less take the time to plow through it?
4
posted on
04/21/2004 3:48:23 AM PDT
by
dawn53
To: dawn53
Strategery in motion..a lovely thing to watch.
5
posted on
04/21/2004 3:55:43 AM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: kattracks
Betcha libraries, the same folks who bought multiple copies of Hilliary's and Clarke's book but who can't find the time to order anything from Regnery, are the same folks buying most of the copies of Woodward's.
6
posted on
04/21/2004 3:57:45 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: kcvl
I am a book lover. I have an incurable, terminal case of BAS (Book Acquisition Syndrome). A few years ago I joined a book club that specialized in these kinds (political) of tomes. I quit buying them because things change so quickly on the political landscape that they become dust collectors in about a week. Worthless except to those who hole themselves up inside the Beltway tenaciously holding to the belief that that is reality.
7
posted on
04/21/2004 4:12:25 AM PDT
by
aardvark1
(You can't have everything...where would you put it? --Steven Wright)
To: aardvark1
"Sludge-like prose" really nails it, too. In "All the President's Men," there's actually a jibe from Bernstein about how badly Woodward writes: "as though English is his second language."
To: kattracks
It is revealing to compare the rigorous intellectual integrity of Ann Coulter's footnotes in her books to those in Bob Woodward's sludge-bound tomes. Woodward may have inadvertently exposed the myths fostered by the liberal antiwar left about the preparation for war within the Bush administration, but overall Woodward is hardly a credible source. He would do better cavorting again with Deep Throat.
9
posted on
04/21/2004 5:34:44 AM PDT
by
OESY
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson