To: mvpel
When you start the 'selective' acceptance of medals awarded - you sure do. How can you be sure the others weren't just as bogus. You say these 3 PH's are bogus - how can you accept all the others without question. That is truly dishonest & a road I prefer to leave untraveled.
This 'ragging on' the record of JK only most legitimate any questions of GWB's service. Why can't you see the logic in that. Don't let your distatse for one lead to the dishonor of both.
To: familyofman
How can you be sure the others weren't just as bogus?Because I saw the tiny little scar on his front left shoulder and the huge mass of twisted scars on his back left shoulder where the Viet Cong bullet exploded out of his flesh, that's how.
101 posted on
04/20/2004 6:50:19 PM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: familyofman
"This 'ragging on' the record of JK only most legitimate any questions of GWB's service." On the contrary. Every public appearance John F. Kerry has made, since he began running for the presidencty, he has never failed to mention that HE WAS A VIETNAM VET. (You might have noticed that it has become somewhat of a joke to those of us on the internet.....you know, the part he calls the Republican Attack Machine.) He ran on this record. He will now get to live by his record.
107 posted on
04/20/2004 6:51:40 PM PDT by
A Citizen Reporter
(Proud member of the Republican Attack Machine.)
To: familyofman
This 'ragging on' the record of JK only most legitimate any questions of GWB's service. Why can't you see the logic in that. Don't let your distatse for one lead to the dishonor of both.
I think both records should have been left as was.... They both served in their own way with honorable discharges.. Both have much more to examine that is current to their present day thinking that gives insight into their fitness to serve as President....
However Kerry failed and should have put a stop from his campaign position of the hounding of President Bush's military record. When he didn't respond to the incessant media barrage then he in someways has left himself open to the same barrage albeit from a different source.
126 posted on
04/20/2004 7:00:52 PM PDT by
deport
(To a dog all roads lead home.......)
To: familyofman
Let me see if I understand your perspective ...
- Bush went through three weeks of AWOL slander, and submitted 300 pages of documents to the liberal media for their inspection.
- Kerry brags about dubious honors, but should not be questioned.
You don't work for Kerry's campaign by any chance?
173 posted on
04/20/2004 7:19:55 PM PDT by
watchin
To: familyofman
How can you be sure the others weren't just as bogus.The others aren't applying for the job of Commander In Chief of the United States of America!
To: familyofman
Don't let your distatse for one lead to the dishonor of both. Does this mean we can't call him "Lead Butt"???
334 posted on
04/20/2004 8:58:09 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(I havn't seen my therapist in 5 years. Neither has anyone else ;0))
To: familyofman
This 'ragging on' the record of JK only most legitimate any questions of GWB's service. Why can't you see the logic in that. Why can't I see it your way where one man who doesn't run on his military experience gets dogged by it yet another runs entirely on his military experience but cannot be questioned??? You, sir, make absolutely no sense. Why cant you see that?
414 posted on
04/21/2004 6:20:34 AM PDT by
smith288
(Who would terrorists want for president? 60% say Kerry 25% say Bush... Who would you vote for?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson