Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skywarner
Again, we are all STILL waiting for your official source in regards to your previous statement that no air cover was in the air for several hours after the 9/11 attacks.

There was 1 hour and 53 minutes between the first notification that flight 11 was off course and not responding and the time that flight 93 crashed.

For that matter, what is your official source to back up your statement that fighters are scrambled within 5-10 minutes of a hijacking (prior to 9/11)?

A former Pentagon air traffic controller says "All those years ago when I was at the Pentagon, this wouldn't have happened. ATC Radar images were (and are) available in the understructures of the Pentagon, and any commercial flight within 300 miles of D. C. that made an abrupt course change toward Washington, or turned off their transponder and refused to communicate with ATC, would have been intercepted at supersonic speeds within minutes by fighters out of Andrews AFB. Why there were no fighters from Andrews AFB up baffles me. If we could get fighters notified, scrambled, and airborne within about 6 minutes from Andrews AFB then, we could now."
Before the attacks, the protocols had been relaxed during the Clinton administration.

I'm happy to place the blame on the Clinton administration. But the fact is that one way or another our defense was not ready to defend us when an actual attack occurred.

AGAIN, I ask you, were those two F-16's on afterburner that I saw peeling overhead that morning at about 9:20am just a figment of my imagination? I will answer it for you.

I already posted answers to that question twice.

226 posted on 04/20/2004 10:03:10 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: Maximilian
See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml

See Document links Saddam, bin Laden http://www.tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml
230 posted on 04/20/2004 10:15:45 PM PDT by narses (Who is General Failure and why is he reading my disk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson