I'm curious. What in your opinion is "tinfoil-hat" about the notion that McVeigh could have had an accomplice we don't know about? Or that such a videotape could exist?
And what does your state of residence have to do with anything?
I'm afraid I don't understand the hostility here. As an Oklahoman, wouldn't you WANT to know if there is still an unpunished OKC bomber roaming around free somewhere? Why on earth would you want to cover that up or be hostile to incoming evidence indicating it?
There simply isn't any grand "conspiracy" hidden from public view beyond those already brought to justice, i.e., McVeigh, Fortier, and Nichols. Plain, simple, period.
What makes you so sure?
in *one* person's testimony (no context of the entire testimony is provided, of course)
Could you kindly explain how "context" could, even in theory, alter our interpretation of testimony which indicates that this logbook entry exists? Maybe the witness was relating a dream he had, is that what you mean?
If you really want to claim that there is more "going on" than we know about in the case, you should openly state so
Fine, I'll take you up on that. I think there is more going on (I don't know why anyone would put that phrase in quotes) than we know about in the case. And you... don't? So you think that you know everything there is to know about this case?
But there is simply not any "OKC bombing conspiracy," plain and simple, Period. End-of-sentence.
Holy cow that's a bizarre thing to say.
Even according to the official story, Mr. McVeigh and Mr. Nichols, BY DEFINITION, participated in a conspiracy together. I believe it's one of the charges against Nichols in fact. So how in the world you can say "there is simply not any OKC bombing conspiracy"??
Not even the one that bombed the OKC building in the first place???
Sorry, the existence of a CONSPIRACY is not even open to question. There WAS a CONSPIRACY, period, end of story. I would think you, as a person who has lived in Oklahoma his whole life except for his time in the service, would understand that.
What this evidence seems to point to, and what some of us would be interested to discover, is that this CONSPIRACY (which DID EXIST!!) involved more than the two people "McVeigh" and "Nichols".
I still don't understand why you, as an Oklahoman, would be so hostile to the possibility, or why you wouldn't be interested in catching any other CONSPIRATORS which may have existed.