Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS
"No doubt, more qualified than you have seen objects that have not or cannot be identified."

It's just a shame that many make the giant leap from an UNIDENTIFIED Flying Object to one that they IDENTIFY as an extraterrestrial intelligently controlled object.

It's not a shame, it's human nature.

However, I wasn't referring to those types. I was referring to trained, credible professionals such as air traffic controllers, pilots, cops, doctors engineers etc...

Please ping me when you decide to be a bit clearer about whatever point you were trying to make.

My pleasure RS. If you will bring you're attention to my first post above, you will note it says, "No doubt, more qualified than you have seen objects that have not or cannot be identified." I did *not* say or even imply that these credible individuals IDENTIFIED these objects as extraterrestrial intelligently controlled objects.

I only stated that these individuals are more qualified to distinguish an identifiable object and are more qualified than most to say that the object they observed was not identifiable. For example, I feel that a professional air traffic controller that watches aircraft for a living, is probably more qualified than most to say that what they saw flying was unidentifiable or not. I never suggested that they were more qualified to determine if these objects were extraterrestrial intelligently controlled objects.

88 posted on 04/20/2004 9:26:19 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf
"For example, I feel that a professional air traffic controller that watches aircraft for a living, is probably more qualified than most to say that what they saw flying was unidentifiable or not. "

I would surmise that most professional air traffic controllers watch radar screens these days - It's probably the ground controllers that are staring out the windows.

Interesting word "unidentifiable" .... Not only would they be saying that THEY cannot identify the object, but the properties of it that they CAN identify would somehow make it unidentifiable in total.
90 posted on 04/20/2004 12:23:29 PM PDT by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson