To: Brian Mosely
Why does it take such a large plane to drop a small bomb? 15 million? Is it gold plated?
7 posted on
04/18/2004 5:43:33 PM PDT by
reluctantwarrior
(Strength and Honor, just call me Buzzkill for short......)
To: reluctantwarrior
I wonder the same thing.
What does this gain us over, say, a cruise missle?
You had to have the gps coordinates in advance, but
I guess you get more bang on target than a cruise missle
On the other hand, flying at 400 mph and 35,000 feet,
is not 'terribly' risky for a manned flight.
9 posted on
04/18/2004 5:49:11 PM PDT by
DefCon
To: reluctantwarrior
Why does it take such a large plane to drop a small bomb? Is that bomb the limits of its capacity? Or were they testing other capabilities -- such as being able to deliver a bomb to a specified target, which is somewhat irrelevant to the mass of the bomb (except in its descent phase)?
13 posted on
04/18/2004 5:57:18 PM PDT by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: reluctantwarrior
15 million? Is it gold plated? With fighter-bombers in the $100-200 million range this thing sounds very inexpensive to me.
Advantage over a cruise missile is that it is re-useable. Even if only 75-80% make it back that is a huge savings.
To: reluctantwarrior
Why does it take such a large plane to drop a small bomb? 15 million? Is it gold plated?
It's a TEST. The actual bombload of the thing is 3,000 lbs. Pretty good considering the aircrafts weight is only 8,000 lbs. The price is cheap when compared to ny manned bomber.
25 posted on
04/18/2004 6:28:15 PM PDT by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: reluctantwarrior
Will it fly up a Spanish PM's butt or tickle old fatso Chirac....just before it's cargo hits home?
36 posted on
04/18/2004 6:45:40 PM PDT by
pointsal
To: reluctantwarrior
15 million? Is it gold plated? No, but it has tail fins and white-wall tires!
49 posted on
04/18/2004 7:24:34 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson