[Torie]

Advocating government programs to facilitate the more rapid death of a subgroup that discommodes you, is at once both nasty and selfish, and of course morally wrong. I hope that helps.

[Mark was here]

I really feel no charity towards those who knowingly and purposefully choose to harm themselves. I would rather help those whose misfortune is accidental. If thats called being self-righteous so be it.

Do you feel the government should insure houses built on the ocean front, only to rebuild them year after year?

Where does personal responsibility fit into your vocabulary?

People who are aware of Aids, and continue to seek their pleasure with reckless abandon, are aware of the storm approaching, and deserve no shelter in the taxpayers wallet.

[doberville]

I do not find it either selfish OR nasty when someone advocates letting a subcultural group commit hara kari via its own self destructive behaviour.

This same self-destructive group has spent a fortune in money, time and effort trying to destroy the basics of Western culture: religion and the family unit. They find it neither selfish OR nasty to ruin young lives with their seductions; they care not that they are infecting others and affecting whole families.

So, I ask you, as the defender of those projecting their sins upon us: What is wrong with deviates facing the consequences of their own behaviour?

[glaseatr]

Torie as someone who has to work in "Baghdad by the Bay" and have the ...hem.. Privilege of working with members of the FREAK community I have seen and heard enough that it makes me ill. To think that these people deserve anything less than scorn is a disservice to them.

[Secret Agent Man]

Ummm, forcing citizens to pay for programs that promote immoral behavior among groups of citizens is also immoral and wrong, just so YOU are clear.