Replies

Just looked through the PDF's at Forensic Intelligence International.

I'm not convinced of the veracity of this group or the information.

For example - Gerard Van Hoorelbeke, a federal convict, supposedly wrote a letter to FBI Director Freeh, in which he claims to have had access to FBI-302's concerning Gregory Scarpa and that he had confronted Ramzi Yousef with them - Yousef allegedly stated, “That don’t mean shit, soon “Bin Laden” will use your own planes as bombs to take down the W.T.C.”

I find it highly improbable that an inmate would have had access to sensitive FBI 302's.

The 302's themself seem suspicious. I used to write interview reports and these just don't "sound" right.

For example - SCARPA is refered to continually throughout the transcript - including a reference to (PROTECT IDENTITY). Normal procedure (and common sense!!) would dictate that SCARPA be refered to once, completely at the beginning of the transcript including his desire for confidentiality / protection - thereafter he would be refered to as SOURCE. Furthermore, as every 302 must stand on it's own - each initial reference to persons / places is always "complete" - thereafter "YOUSEF" etc would be used. Also, since SCARPA was (Protect Identity), how did a convict get his hands on unredacted copies (the Agent's name(s) is curiously redacted)?

All in all, it sound's "fishy" - I will "note" the info, but definate cooboration is needed!