Yes, good home page! How are things in O-town? Eisner's getting ready for the
g@yd@y festivities in June, I'm sure...
Anyway, I had a further question beyond the answers given on your home page.
If all this is true, and OKC was an act of Iraqi terrorism (Jayna Davis is on Glenn Beck tomorrow, btw) why hasn't the Bush admin. cited it as justification for the Iraqi invasion? Surely Ashcroft knew of this memo long before, and God only knows what other interesting crud was cooked up by the Clintons, which current officials know about, and which may still be in place.
Why the silence? Why the smiles, handshakes and suck-ups to Ted Kennedy? Is it just the 'new tone'? Does Bush really think the 'new tone' is worth jeopardizing the lives of Americans? I don't think so.
Perhaps it's the FBI files. Are the Clintons exercising a degree of control over the US Government to this very day with the political elite in their crosshairs? Is the Bush Admin compromised, perhaps with unsavory info on his father? Just theorizing out loud.
How deep does the muck flow? And how long are we going to live under the influence of these people?