To: F.J. Mitchell
The last time I checked, I have not fallen off any turnip trucks. There is no need for that kind of response.
I amended my comments to "if" she was threatened.
In addition, I do not deplore action against enemies. I am strongly in favor of the appropriate action. I applauded the Israeli response to killing the Hamas leader. I am 100% in favor of our actions in Iraq.
Perhaps she was not threatened, but the original poster appeared to have condoned threats to her and that is what I was responding to.
I have no problem with someone disagreeing with me or with others, but come on, try a little civility.
108 posted on
04/17/2004 7:18:02 PM PDT by
arjay
("I don't do bumper stickers." Donald Rumsfeld)
To: arjay
Let's not be so hyper sensitive, shall we? I can handle a little sarcasm when it is aimed at me, with no hurt feelings on my part-I just assume that other's skin's are as thick as mine.
If Gorelicker was threatened as she claims, it is highly unlikely that the threat came from anywhere but her fellow buffoons of the left.
Are you familar with how involved in the mishandling of events leading up to 911 Gorelicker was personally responsible for. Do you realize that the only reason the Dems. appointed her to the committee is to ensure that she would never have to testify?
If you are indeed a Conservative Republican, rather than a democrat sleeper plant-have a little faith in the integrity of your fellow Republicans. The bad guys are on the left, where Jaimie Gorelick hangs her bonnet.
116 posted on
04/17/2004 7:36:20 PM PDT by
F.J. Mitchell
(Try the waffle house Senator kerry-the Whitehouse is already taken.)
To: arjay
the original poster appeared to have condoned threats to her and that is what I was responding to. He did not.
He mocked her playing this clearly made-up victim card.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson