To: Wolfhound777; MEG33
Saddam had the Shiites in fear for their lives.
The US command will be doing its job when the Shiites are again in fear for their lives.
Sadr wouldn't have set foot in Iraq if Saddam was in power,he would have been killed on sight.
The US should have killed him weeks ago, without regard to any "consequences" or threats from Iran, terrorists, the DNC, or the Washington Post.
Its really that simple.
13 posted on
04/17/2004 10:29:47 AM PDT by
Rome2000
(Foreign leaders for Kerry!!!!!)
To: Rome2000
If only you were in charge.
15 posted on
04/17/2004 10:31:12 AM PDT by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: Rome2000
Saddam had the Shiites in fear for their lives. The US command will be doing its job when the Shiites are again in fear for their lives.
Sadr wouldn't have set foot in Iraq if Saddam was in power,he would have been killed on sight.
The US should have killed him weeks ago, without regard to any "consequences" or threats from Iran, terrorists, the DNC, or the Washington Post.
Its really that simple.
You are absolutely correct and will get no argument here. But the General needs the SECDEF and the Pentagon to give the go ahead to end the cease fire and brutally crush the uprising. He can not just make up his own ROE.
44 posted on
04/18/2004 9:53:04 AM PDT by
Wolfhound777
(It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson