To: macsmind76
I cannot believe a reporter from the Associated Press wrote this. Their liberal partisanship is usually so slanted they make themselves a parody of bias.
I wonder if this means the "begining of the end" for this sick, sad 9-11 commission?
But one senior U.S. intelligence official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the 1997 National Intelligence Estimate "identified bin Laden and his followers and threats they were making and said it might portend attacks inside the United States."
As a Democratic staffer told the Wall Street Journal last week:
"Gorelick is not on the 9-11 panel because of her brilliant legal mind. She is there to go after the Bush administration and to protect the Clintons."
2 posted on
04/17/2004 5:18:40 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: SkyPilot
The organization and conduct of, and coverup by, this committee is
more than enough insight and evidence into EXACTLY
how we in America became vulnerable to the 911 Atrocities by al Qaeda.
19 posted on
04/17/2004 5:52:38 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: SkyPilot
"Gorelick is not on the 9-11 panel because of her brilliant legal mind. She is there to go after the Bush administration and to protect the Clintons."
Oh shock of all shock, wonder what the Clintons need protection about?
Wonder what dirty little dealings the Clintons had need to cover up, and were willing to sell out this nation to terrorists to protect themselves.
The "mother" of all "cover-ups", I sure do hope that bit of "intel" that came across their desks has not been destroyed, the smoking gun of 911!
Could this have come about over Foster's death??????
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson