To: paul51
Did you see the recent similar case in Newark, New Jersey, IIRC. The judge dismissed it with prejudice, which means they can't attempt to try a similar suit again, IIRC, because the city couldn't document actual damages.
But as for your main point about spending tax payers' money, all these jurisdictions are controlled by rats, so what do they care about taxpayer money? As a general rule, they also have very strict gun control. They're going for a number of reasons: hoping for a big monetary win, bankrupting or increasing the cost of folks in the firearms business, and re-inforcing a negative image of guns.
4 posted on
04/16/2004 10:28:03 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
One of the defenses tactics should be to widely advertise the cost of the suit to the cities on an ongoing basis highlighting the affect on their budgets.
6 posted on
04/16/2004 10:38:30 PM PDT by
paul51
To: neverdem
Another lawsuit... another group of idiots.
I hope they lose so badly they suffer an emotional breakdown.
7 posted on
04/16/2004 10:38:47 PM PDT by
Bogey78O
(I voted for this tagline... before I voted against it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson