Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retroactive Valor: The Democratic party’s shoulda-woulda-coulda strategy.
National Review ^ | April 13, 2004 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 04/16/2004 2:09:47 PM PDT by quidnunc

Americans hungry for a mistake-proof party uncompromisingly resolute on national security now have found one — the pre-9/11 Democrats. Created in hindsight and forged in recrimination, the pre-9/11 Democrats are unwilling to let any obstacle stand in the way of their defense of the American homeland. Who knew contemporary Democrats could so readily combine the toughest aspects of J. Edgar Hoover and Douglas MacArthur?

The pre-9/11 Democrats, as portrayed by their reaction to the work of the 9/11 Commission, are not plagued by niggling civil-liberty concerns. They were willing prior to 9/11 — or so they imply now — to brush aside the restrictions on cooperation between the CIA and FBI that had been imposed by liberals throughout the course of three decades. Constitutional worries about infringing on the rights of criminal suspects in the United States? Don't be silly. And give the CIA more money and authority to carry out assassinations and other covert actions while you're at it.

The pre-9/11 Democrats don't care about planning or diplomacy. They were willing to leap into a war in Central Asia on a moment's notice — as soon as President Bush took office — without bothering to set a careful strategy or consult seriously with allies. That might take time. They were willing to preempt a threat while it was still gathering strength and before its murderous potential had become clear.

The pre-9/11 Democrats are ethnically insensitive. They were willing to institute a security lockdown at U.S. airports, with presumably a particular emphasis on scrutiny of young Arab men. They were willing to engage in sweeping ethnic profiling at U.S. flight schools and crack down on lax immigration policies. Ethnic pressure groups be damned.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anotherdumbexcerpt

1 posted on 04/16/2004 2:09:49 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Geez, we have to excerpt National Review now?

BTW, I hope Rich, or someone at National Review, or some group of them, or some organization, is preparing a "minority report" to rebut the "findings" of the 9-11 Commission, what they omitted, overlooked, spun, and ignored.

2 posted on 04/16/2004 2:35:20 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
And Jamie GoreLick was number 2 under Janet Reno. Ugh, gaak, sthptttttt... the mental image in my head is killing me.
3 posted on 04/16/2004 2:35:44 PM PDT by hang 'em (Kerry is a war criminal, a traitor, gigolo and liar. On the other hand, he's tall and has big hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Geez, we have to excerpt National Review now?

No, you don't HAVE to.

FMCDH

4 posted on 04/16/2004 3:22:35 PM PDT by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson