Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Background: "Executive Agreement" - Without Senate Approval
IMRA ^ | 16 April 2004

Posted on 04/15/2004 11:28:48 PM PDT by yonif

"A source in the American government said this evening that the Bush declaration obligates all administrations and is an official "executive agreement" in every respect."

So triumphantly proclaimed Israel Television Channel One Mabat Evening News anchor Chaim Yavin on the 15 April broadcast.

Under 11 FAM 720 "Negotiation and Signature" - State Department Circular No. 175, December 13, 1955 as amended (known as the "Circular 175 Procedure") the president can indeed make an "executive agreement" that is an "international agreement other than a treaty" that is pursuant to his constitutional authority as Chief Executive to represent the nation in foreign affairs and the executive agreement is valid without requiring the approval of the Senate.

[ http://foia.state.gov/masterdocs/11fam/11m0720.pdf ]

An "executive agreement" does indeed obligate all administrations - but it only takes the stroke of a pen of a president on another "executive agreement" to rescind the previous "executive agreement".

In sharp contrast, a treaty approved by the Senate (approval requires a two-thirds majority) can only be rescinded by Senate vote - also with a two-thirds majority.

If President Bush decides to make his letter an "executive agreement" it will only be valid for as long as an American president wants it to be.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: danger; executiveagreement; gazaplan; israel

1 posted on 04/15/2004 11:28:49 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Thinkin' Gal; Bobby777; adam_az; Alouette; IFly4Him; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 04/15/2004 11:29:01 PM PDT by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
I think they mean "Executive Order"...
3 posted on 04/16/2004 1:42:18 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson