To: DManA
Notice that the passage wasn't removed because it's a crock of Shiite, it was removed because it was OFFENSIVE to the Indian tribe. Is the new rule of history books that lies are ok if they support third-world cultures and don't offend another third-world culture?
To: ChicagoHebrew
it was offensive because it was a crock of shi+
56 posted on
10/09/2006 11:08:41 AM PDT by
zimdog
(at least you're a tigers fan)
To: ChicagoHebrew
Also, American Indian nations are technically "fourth world" not "third world".
61 posted on
10/09/2006 11:38:26 AM PDT by
zimdog
(at least you're a tigers fan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson