To: Tedster
I'm wondering if our gov't is following cargo jets with UAV's and this is the resultant collision.
It is known that cargo jets (like the FedEx DC-10 in the story) are one of the most vunerable to terrorist use as the crew size is small and security is not the same as for passenger flights.
Using UAV's to follow jets requires less fatigue than using manned fighter jets.
I am familiar with the Valentich case. Very strange and given the communications in this case versus the communications in the Valentich case.
I am convinced that TWA 800 was a terrorist act covered up for political purposes (election year). I live in Williamsport, PA which is right next door to Montoursville, PA where so many high school kids lost their lives on a trip to France on TWA 800. Those families are still anguished to this day because the facts do not add up to the cause. They could understand terrorism, but the mechanical cause does not fit the facts as known. Their lives are a daily agony.
To: Erik Latranyi
How many cargo flights are there in the U.S. every single day? Why would the government follow a jet with a UAV. The UAVs aren't jet powered, so how could they follow the jets. Makes NO sense.
67 posted on
04/17/2004 8:02:05 AM PDT by
ItisaReligionofPeace
(I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
To: Erik Latranyi
I share your concern for TWA 800 cover up/
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson