Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reno: Nothing kept FBI from sharing info
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 4/14/04 | Murray Evans - AP

Posted on 04/14/2004 8:13:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Diogenesis
Wow. Are there any rest stops between her eyebrows and her eyeballs?
21 posted on 04/14/2004 9:50:30 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"No. Reno contradicted Ashcroft in her speech on Wednesday."

Well I find that a little hard to believe since Ashcroft hadn't even testified yet. He was the last one for the day, so how could Reno contradict Ashcroft when he hadn't even spoken yet.

22 posted on 04/14/2004 10:03:42 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
C'mon, Bunky.
Ashcroft testified on Tuesday, Reno gave her speech on Wednesday. What part don't you get?
23 posted on 04/14/2004 10:06:50 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AllenBarraIsRight
Her primary mission was to interfere with any inquiry that got near the ChiCom connections. Bet that's part of the Clinton culture the Commission wont touch.
24 posted on 04/14/2004 10:08:11 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>
"She" is not called the rocky mountain oyster of S.E. Florida for nothing.

I'm glad it's not dinner time, because if it was, you just made me lose my appetite.

25 posted on 04/14/2004 10:08:27 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The press has a smoking gun in the form of a declassified document, a spent weapon in the form of a declined offer of incarceration, a sitting subversive commisioner intent on distorting historical data, a majority of newspapers nationwide playing favorites by ignoring it while CNN & PMSNBC give her face time to weave her premeditated denial, bolstered by Reno's ramblings!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Is it 1998 yet????

26 posted on 04/14/2004 10:11:55 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (Kerry is a combat vet. But he fought for the wrong side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
What part don't you get, and where the hell have you been? She testified Tuesday morning and Ashcroft testified Tuesday afternoon. I think you'd better go back to bed and wake up on the right day. Put that in your Bunky and sit on it.
27 posted on 04/14/2004 10:24:27 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
From the article:

LEXINGTON, Ky. (AP) - Contradicting her successor, former Attorney General Janet Reno said Wednesday.... Reno, speaking Wednesday at the University of Kentucky, took issue with Attorney General John Ashcroft's statement Tuesday....

Learn to read, Bunky.

28 posted on 04/14/2004 10:30:21 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"Learn to read, Bunky."

Yeah Thanks Lancey. I still say Ashcroft contradicted her first since she actually said the same thing about sharing info in her hearing testimony on Tuesday. Her speech at the college is just a reiteration of what she stated on Tuesday.

29 posted on 04/14/2004 10:40:01 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
The scumbag press would give Reno the benefit of the doubt over Ashcroft no matter when anybody testified or what anybody actually said. Have you seen the "Gorelick Wall" articles that are coming out now? They all seem to conclude with Gorelich asking rhetorically, "If Ashcroft didn't like the policies, then why didn't he change them?" See, the press is already spinning for the Democrats.

Regards,
LH
30 posted on 04/14/2004 10:52:48 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Yep, Sean Hannity played a recording of her saying that today. It wouldn't have mattered what Ashcroft had done with the memo, the damage had already been done to intelligence, and there was no way Ashcroft would have been able to set it right before 9/11. That memo was written in 1995. Six years had elapsed. Can you imagine what was missed during all that time? By the way, diid anybody check to see if she'd CC'd a copy to bin Laden? I wouldn't put it past her...the witch.
31 posted on 04/14/2004 11:01:41 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson