[justshutupandtakeit]

You could ask the same thing about the WTC1. I think we are seeing some of the reason: thanks to Goreslick we had to have a "Beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of proof. "Clear and convincing" or "a preponderance of the evidence" is good enough for us in establishing the proof.

[american spirit]

Speaking of WTC1 how come there's not more discussion about the FBI's prior knowledge of that event and the fact that they had an informant within the terrorist group pleading with them to intervene before something happened?