Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jospehm20
No problem in places where no hostile activity is to be found like say in Europe. But American civilian truck drivers in a hostile/war zone instead of troops doind the task?
7 posted on 04/14/2004 6:10:33 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
Because it's a civilian contract.

I turned down an Iraq gig myself, but it would have been nestled in the midst of a armed military base. Not out there on the road every day in a Mad Max replay.

Decided the one-year family separation was too much, and there's no way I'd want to be unarmed in a live shooting zone, having been there once before in an overseas position.

11 posted on 04/14/2004 6:23:30 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Destro
We don't have enough transportation units in the Army anymore. The trans units we do have are working non stop hauling stuff, but it is not enough to supply everything needed. They have to contract civilians to haul a lot of the Army's stuff. Even during Desert Storm we used a lot of civilian trucking to support the Army. We have always been short on trans units. I am on Camp Anaconda right now and the idea of having locals drive big trucks onto post is out. I do not want to see a big rig packed with explosives set off on post anytime soon. I think that is probably why we use US citizens instead of locals.
12 posted on 04/14/2004 6:24:32 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson