I am curious how the left is going to spin this
1 posted on
04/14/2004 5:54:29 PM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Time to hire more soldiers.
2 posted on
04/14/2004 5:58:27 PM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Kaslin
I remember when Clinton promised us we'd be out of Bosnia by Christmas. That was in 1995. I was there.
To: Kaslin
The article title is a good clue to the spin.
Troops have been betrayed, the administration has broken promises, or lied (again).
I am so tired of this leftist carp.
4 posted on
04/14/2004 6:05:59 PM PDT by
Valpal1
(Impeach the 9th! Please!!)
To: Kaslin
I am curious how the left is going to spin this.It's chaos. It's catastrophe. It's a crazy policy to enrich evil contrators that's now spun badly out of control, harming the peaceful people of Iraq and a nice guy like Saddam. How'm I doing?
7 posted on
04/14/2004 6:14:17 PM PDT by
68skylark
(.)
To: Kaslin
don't know about the left, but it sucks if you're one of the extended troops...
8 posted on
04/14/2004 6:19:50 PM PDT by
nicko
To: Kaslin
There is no active duty soldier who is ever promised anything regarding assignments. Every soldier takes an oath to obey the orders of the officers appointed over....now that part is certain.
12 posted on
04/14/2004 6:48:55 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: Kaslin
During WWII, under a Democrat president, my dad was sent to Europe...for the duration. He understood what that meant. His family understood what that meant. He came back several months
after the war ended. He was lucky...only he and seven of the other guys in his platoon who shipped over with him were still alive and well.
The guys who were supposed to be coming back from Iraq were projected to be rotated back about now. Conditions have changed. They are being extended. Assignments can change for contingencies at any time. What's so difficult to understand about that?
OK, so a bunch of those folks extended are upset. I would be, too. But my 22 years in the military would make me understand that this was something that could happen.
OK, so a lot of the deployed folks' families are upset. Mine would be, too. I hope, though, that I would have prepared them well enough to be able to weather a contingency-dictated tour extension. If I had failed to do so, that would be my fault.
Hey, we're in the middle of a war! Wars are horrible, messy events, and being caught up in one is absolutely no fun...been there, done that, got the t-shirt. Once started, wars need to be left to the commanders on the ground, politicians need to stay the heck out of the road, and pundits need to do what pundits do.
If Mr. Kerry were any kind of real veteran, he would understand this simple concept and not be working so hard to screw things up and get more American kids killed...cause sure as God made little green apples, that's exactly what he and his buds are doing. If the Democrat power figures and the media had any real loyalty to those kids and their commanders, they would be acting a heck of a lot differently than they are.
14 posted on
04/14/2004 7:14:46 PM PDT by
gaelwolf
To: Kaslin
I've always thought Bush's only mistake was not increasing the size of the military after 911. Clinton took us from 18 to 10 divisions. We should have gone back up to 12-13 after 911.
16 posted on
04/14/2004 7:17:08 PM PDT by
Timmy
To: Kaslin
I can remember in 1950 when Truman "extended" enlistments for thousands of men for 9 months. They were not professionals, just volunteers getting a hundred a month.
19 posted on
04/14/2004 7:28:20 PM PDT by
cynicom
To: Kaslin
Aren't they the ones who have been bellyaching for months that we NEEDED MORE SOLDIERS. Now they have their wish - and we can only expect them to complain about it. What else is new?
59 posted on
04/15/2004 1:38:10 AM PDT by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson