Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmishDude
Like I said, it was off the top of my head. I would have done it. He should not be allowed to live down Bork, as long as he stands by his disgraceful decision.

But fine: he could have talked about Spectre's pro-abort extremism, about his tearing down Bush's tax cut, about all sorts of more current things.

Dan
23 posted on 04/14/2004 3:27:53 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr
The thing is, I'm too young to remember the Bork hearings. It was that long ago. In theory, since he was re-elected since that occured, Pennsylvanians don't mind that. In theory, Toomey has to use Specter's record from the last 5.5 years.

Rush still should have asked at least one confrontational question, though.

27 posted on 04/14/2004 3:37:23 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson