Skip to comments.
Bush Is Stumped on Question of Mistakes
AP ^
| 4/14/04
| CALVIN WOODWARD
Posted on 04/14/2004 10:52:28 AM PDT by bkwells
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: TexasCajun
Actually, he should have said that the Steel Tarriffs were a mistake. One which has now been corrected.
Gum
21
posted on
04/14/2004 11:04:59 AM PDT
by
ChewedGum
(aka King of Fools)
To: bkwells
The only mistake was not beating the crap out of the journalist!
22
posted on
04/14/2004 11:05:00 AM PDT
by
verity
(A Vote for Kerry is a vote for National Suicide!)
To: Lee Heggy
left the keys in the ignition...? left the 'W' keys on the keyboard?
23
posted on
04/14/2004 11:05:06 AM PDT
by
MrB
To: bkwells
Bush is right to avoid the blame/mistake issue. Imagine the propaganda that will go on and on, if the President in any way says that he apologizes, made a mistake, etc. Example: "Bush apologizes for 9/11", "Bush accepts blame for 9/11"; much less what our enemies in the ME will come up with. Basically, nothing will advertise weakness (and encourage our enemies) more than contrition at this point and time.
To: newgeezer
It's times like these when I'd pay to see Dubya morph into Coach Bob Knight, telling the press whores a thing or two about their stupid questions. King David would have kilt the first person that axed one of those questions then asked "Any more questions?".
25
posted on
04/14/2004 11:08:21 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(The only book worth reading, and reading, and reading.)
To: Dahoser
I recruit for a living, and the strength and weakness question is in no way moronic. While I prefer to ask the question differently, someone who cannot come up with an area in which they could improve probably will not get the interview with the hiring manager. A good candidate is as aware of their areas of weakness as they are aware of their strengths. If someone can't answer that question intelligently, I'm thinking "Great, another arrogant know it all is just what we need."
That being said, I thought asking GW that over and over was ridiculous.
26
posted on
04/14/2004 11:12:15 AM PDT
by
dmz
To: VadeRetro
"My biggest mistake was expecting intelligent, well-intended questions at this news conference."Good answer. It's a shame he's too darned honest to lie like that.
27
posted on
04/14/2004 11:12:38 AM PDT
by
Frunabulax
("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
To: bkwells
They're ticked off because his answers left the Keery campaign without new soundbites.
28
posted on
04/14/2004 11:12:52 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: bkwells
Funny, they are not harping on Madelin Halfbright who said looking back she would not have done anything differently. Sad thing is, I believe her.
To: JimRed
Kerry, not Keery! Preview is your friend, JimRed!
30
posted on
04/14/2004 11:14:03 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: bkwells
We will not waver; We will not tire; We will not falter; We will not fail. Peace and freedom will prevail. George W. Bush,September 2001. I believe he has prety much stayed the course.
31
posted on
04/14/2004 11:14:50 AM PDT
by
eastforker
(The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
To: dmz
I recruit for a living, and the strength and weakness question is in no way moronic. While I prefer to ask the question differently, someone who cannot come up with an area in which they could improve probably will not get the interview with the hiring manager. A good candidate is as aware of their areas of weakness as they are aware of their strengths. If someone can't answer that question intelligently, I'm thinking "Great, another arrogant know it all is just what we need."Job candidates and politicians are completely different animals. The strength/weakness question is not analogous. An equivalent question in the job world might be "why did you stop stealing from your last employer?".
32
posted on
04/14/2004 11:20:51 AM PDT
by
Frunabulax
("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
To: bkwells
"I'm sure something will pop into my head here," he said Tuesday. It didn't. I feel for our president! He can do no right, ever, in these peoples' eyes. It wouldn't matter one way or the other to them, no matter what he may say! They just pick and pick and pick!
33
posted on
04/14/2004 11:22:33 AM PDT
by
IamHD
To: bkwells
I counted at least three reporters who asked the President to name mistakes he thought he had made. Of course if he had named one, that's all the media would have talked about out of the entire conference.
34
posted on
04/14/2004 11:26:12 AM PDT
by
Hugin
To: bkwells; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LindaSOG; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; Bethbg79; bentfeather; ...
35
posted on
04/14/2004 11:32:56 AM PDT
by
68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
(FOX, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC The big 5 liberal media. Read Free Republic instead and learn the truth.)
To: Hugin
I counted at least three reporters who asked the President to name mistakes he thought he had made. Of course if he had named one, that's all the media would have talked about out of the entire conference.Yeah, not to mention the ones who kept demanding that he apologize to to nation because our enemies fight us instead of walking meekly into their graves. They have the nerve to waste everyone's time taking cheap shots and asking trick questions, then they whine that they learned nothing new.
36
posted on
04/14/2004 11:35:31 AM PDT
by
Frunabulax
("If the truth will kill them, let them die.")
To: bkwells
"Bush was asked in his prime-time news conference if he had made
any mistakes."
AP can't even report accurately. The question was: "After 9/11, what would your biggest mistake be, would you say, and what lessons have you learned from it?
He should have said "Thinking the media would give an accurate view of the progress in Iraq" or "Thinking the media would eventually stop asking these repetitive stupid questions."
37
posted on
04/14/2004 11:36:21 AM PDT
by
ironman
To: Frunabulax
Try reading the post I responded to first. The poster specifically mentioned the moronic interview question about weakness. Thanks for the tip about politicians and job candidates being different, though. That might really help me in my job.
38
posted on
04/14/2004 11:41:42 AM PDT
by
dmz
To: bkwells
What the dickens is going on at AP? They used to be leftist, but not so extreme as Reuters, BBC, CNN, or half a dozen other outfits. Now they seem to be striving to be the biggest liars of the whole bunch.
Does anyone know why this is happening, or who is in charge there? This can only be deliberate policy from the top, IMHO.
39
posted on
04/14/2004 11:46:14 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Hugin
Of course if he had named one, that's all the media would have talked about out of the entire conference. Reporters to Bush: "Please write John Kerry's next campaign ad."
40
posted on
04/14/2004 11:46:32 AM PDT
by
m87339
(If you could see what a drag it is to be you)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson