Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Lileks: Disquiet, Please
The New Orleans Times Picayune ^ | April 14, 2004 | James Lileks

Posted on 04/14/2004 9:30:26 AM PDT by quidnunc

Victoria's Secret has canceled its TV show, citing the new chill wind blowing through the airwaves since Janet Jackson got pawed in prime time. Unless they have plans to drape tarps over all their storefronts in the malls of America, this seems a bit exaggerated.

No one watches a Victoria's Secret TV special expecting modesty and cerebral pursuits; they watch to see women composed mostly of legs and lips parade around in articles of clothing containing up to 16 molecules of silk. No one sees "Victoria's Secret Special" in TV Guide and thinks it's a program about a 19th century British queen and her heretofore unknown interest in philately. People choose to see it; no one forces them.

But. It is on the public airwaves. Maybe that's the last place we'll have standards. Maybe we, as a society, can learn to live in a world where derrieres are, for the most part, covered on broadcast channels. And perhaps Victoria's Secret can take it to pay-per-view and make a great deal more money. Everyone's happy. Win-win.

But. The Federal Communications Commission has been making noises about regulating cable, which puts an entirely different spin on the public indecency debate. Cable is an entirely different matter.

Background: In the last few years we've seen FM jocks get canned for sponsoring a contest to have sex in a church (brought to you by Samuel Adams beer, ruining its reputation, one ill-advised promotion at a time). We've seen luminaries like Bubba the Love Sponge and St. Stern the Martyr fired or fined or dropped. Why? For talking like 14-year-olds who think it's the height of wit to construct interminable online narratives about their interest in lesbian dwarves. It's a battle to forestall the coarsening of the public sphere, lest we become so ground-down fighting the large public indecencies that we accept the small ones.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anotherdamnexcerpt; anotherstupidexcerpt; excerpexcerptexcerpt; excerptthis; foolishexcerpt; needlessexcerpt

1 posted on 04/14/2004 9:30:27 AM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
most people want a reasonably clean public realm, and they don't care what people do behind closed doors.

Completely reasonable thesis.

2 posted on 04/14/2004 9:34:56 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
Works for me. Too many do care what goes on behind closed doors, though.

3 posted on 04/14/2004 12:09:07 PM PDT by wingnutx (Are you a monthly donor? Why not? (the freeper formerly known as Britton J Wingnutx))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson