There is something more than "funny" going on here. This is a deliberate coverup of something much larger than 911, if that is possible.
Two questions concerning Gorelick that need to be answered:
1. How did she get on this Commission? She didn't just fall down from Heaven. Somebody wanted her there and put her there. Why?
2. Why did Gorelick institute the "wall" memorandum? Was she ordered to do it (and who ordered it) or did she do it on her own. Either way, there was a real motivation behind it. Get to the bottom of this and the 911 Omission will have the answer to it's questions on the "why" 911 happened,... not that it really wants to uncover any deep truths.
IMHO, this was a setup by the clintons to cover their criminality in other areas and prevent our own intelligence and investigative agencies from either connecting the dots or prosecuting their blatant criminality often disguised as incompetence. One need only start naming off events of those days to see why,... Waco, Whitewater, Mena Airport, Vince Foster, Oklahoma City, the Riadys, Charlie Trie, Johnny Chung, Wen ho Lee, the looting of Los Alamos secrets, Ron Brown, China money, LORAL, Livermore Labs and the loss of W-88 nuclear warhead designs, etc. etc., ... what was there that needed "covering up" in those days that required both eyes to be gouged from the FBI and CIA?
Looking for unconnected dots and and asking why the lines weren't connected? Well, there are lots of dots to connect, but no way to connect them if connecting them is prohibited. This was not a "unfortunate" slip-up. It was deliberate policy by deliberate people for deliberate reasons.
The fact terrorists finally slipped through the broken net and caused 911 is only a side and final result of the vast and sinister Clinton Legacy. The 911 dots all emanated from this, and the keystone of the plot has been outed by Ashcroft.