He had Jay-me Gore-lick on and dealt very briefly with her conflict of interest (ie. asked the question and let her answer nearly uninterupted with almost no follow-up) THEN moved on and started asking questions about the different testimonies as if nothing was wrong.
(1) He VALIDATED her presence on the committee rather than bring it under scrutiny and question.
He then had Sensenbrenner on and asked him about Gore-lick and then started asking him whether he (or any of his aides) were meeting with the White House.......ostensibly taking orders.
(2) He tried to INVALIDATE Gore-Licks critic.
THIS IS UNBIASED JOURNALISM?????????????