Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Barnes:On Message(Bush ignores the press and takes his message right to the American people)
The Weekly Standard ^ | April 13, 2004 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 04/13/2004 9:55:16 PM PDT by RWR8189

George W. Bush ignores the press at his press conference and takes his message of steadfastness in Iraq right to the American people.

WATCHING PRESIDENT BUSH'S PRESS CONFERENCE Tuesday night, you could see why he drives the press crazy. No matter what they asked, his answer was invariably the same: We're staying the course in Iraq. It's important to gaining freedom for Iraqis and winning the war on terror.

Not only that, he began the session with reporters by gobbling up 17 minutes of time they consider theirs. He devoted it to an opening statement--it was actually a speech--in which he said basically one thing: We're not flinching in Iraq. He was heroically on message, relentlessly repetitive, but effective in his own way.

Washington hates this type of public performance, which is characteristic of Bush. The press, the political community, the inside-the-Beltway lifers--they prefer a rich display of details, a bit of nuance, and some wit. Reporters, particularly, are soft on presidents who seem to like them or at least pretend to--or who pander to them.

Bush, of course, gives them none of that. He's not aiming to please the Washington crowd--the political elite. His audience is outside the Beltway--the mass--and he does surprisingly well in appealing to it. How does he do it? By being plain spoken and amiable and down to earth. By sounding more like Midland, Texas, than like Georgetown or Chevy Chase. By honing in on a single message and not giving reporters much else to write about. Bush tried Tuesday night to dictate the lead of stories.

If one was expecting a Kissingerian strategic case for America's intervention in Iraq, one wasn't going to get it from Bush. His argument was simple. Freedom in Iraq is good for Iraqis, good for America, and good for the world. And though we've had some tough weeks recently, we're sticking in Iraq and with our plan to turn over sovereignty to Iraqis on June 30.

By my count, reporters got in 15 questions. I categorize them this way: six were seeking information, three were gotcha, three were accusations, one was obscure, one stupid, one showboating. This is a pretty good breakdown of questions. More often than not, the majority of them will be either gotcha or accusations.

One of the gotcha question was disingenuous. Elizabeth Bumiller of the New York Times asked about a statement by Bush to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward in which he said he didn't feel "that sense of urgency" about terrorism before September 11. As any reporter would have known, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice had fleshed out the context of that quote in her testimony last Thursday before the 9/11 Commission. Bush was comparing his feeling before the September 11 attacks with how he felt afterwards.

Several questions were attempts by reporters to get Bush to admit mistakes. These are hardy perennials at presidential press conferences, and Bush wisely didn't take the bait. He knows the reporters won't treat an admission of a mistake as a admirable moment of introspection and candor. Rather, they'll jump on the admission and hammer him. Nor would he apologize for having allowed the September 11 attacks to occur, as his ex-aide Richard Clarke did recently. Bush said the blame was on Osama bin Laden.

The last question came from a fellow from National Public Radio, Don Gonyea, who queried Bush about his supposed failure as a communicator. Sure enough, Bush seized the opportunity to tout himself as a strong leader who can be counted on. "When I say something, I mean it," he declared. I suspect this answer didn't thrill the assembled reporters.

The press conference, only the third prime time one of his presidency, was Bush's idea. My guess is after several weeks of renewed fighting in Iraq and eroding support for the war, he wanted to get back on the political offensive. He may have done so. Polls in a day or two will tell us.

Bush left nothing to chance. Many viewers were unlikely to hang around for the full 62 minutes of the press conference. So he delivered his message right at the top and without interference from the reporters. We're not changing course in Iraq, he said. We're hanging in there. It was a message that no viewer could have missed and one that reporters have heard too often.

 

Fred Barnes is executive editor of The Weekly Standard.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; fredbarnes; pressconference; weeklystandard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: RWR8189; BigSkyFreeper
POTUS ought to hold the same at least monthly.
He makes "useful idiots" out of his (our) enemy press corps while he simultaneously gets to speak directly to us,
in Prime Time free of charge!


21 posted on 04/13/2004 11:03:30 PM PDT by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"Washington hates this type of public performance, which is characteristic of Bush."

Good point. So does Bush. That is why he rarely gives press conferences.

Speeches are a different animal altogether. He loves to read them and confuse the enemy. LOL! Love him!
22 posted on 04/13/2004 11:04:34 PM PDT by YoSoy2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
Your remark was a bit off.

Barnes is indeed a reformed former New Republic writer from 20 years ago.

But, he is pretty straight and supportive on culture war issues which in my view separates him from most Neos.
23 posted on 04/13/2004 11:04:40 PM PDT by wardaddy (This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Draco
ping
24 posted on 04/13/2004 11:05:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in al-Qerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"When I say something, I mean it," he declared. The
implications are numerous. first, it draws a distinction
between himself and "the other guy", who can't seem to
think (or at least say) the same thing twice in a row.

It's also a strong warning that he doesn't idly threaten
rogue regimes. when HE comes for you, he's bringing the
whole load.

that last comment had me off the couch. that should go
in the next "strong leadership" ad.
25 posted on 04/13/2004 11:07:16 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Every Freeper should have the email address of at least 5 newspapers in their state.
 
 
Enter your zip code to view newspapers delivered in your area.
http://www.georgewbush.com/GetActive/Default.aspx
 
 

26 posted on 04/13/2004 11:31:15 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
a focus group reported yesterday said, "When an anti-911 commerical condemning President Bush was run, the people nearly turned over their tables they where so angry." IMHO this is the good news about the press. The people who only watch politics once or twice a month are sick of the press bias and the bashing of a "guy like us." Hope the press stays on message and we turn over Iraq on 6/30. Landslide to follow.
27 posted on 04/14/2004 4:49:19 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Thought you might enjoy Barnes' view of the PC.
28 posted on 04/14/2004 11:09:31 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Bush's numbers go up, the medias go down. A good job.
29 posted on 04/14/2004 11:13:36 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
There you go again...

You make the charge of racism without a shred of evidence to support it.

Weak.

30 posted on 04/15/2004 12:02:50 PM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, .05% third party fringees, democrats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!

~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~

31 posted on 04/15/2004 12:26:15 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
I'm flattered you are following my posts. I think you may learn something about how to debate successfully.
32 posted on 04/15/2004 2:16:29 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
Sure, if you consider simply making things up to be "successful debating." But you obviously do.
33 posted on 04/15/2004 2:49:58 PM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson