Skip to comments.
Gorelick Licked
The American Spectator ^
| 4.14.04
| Wlady Pleszczynski
Posted on 04/13/2004 9:25:14 PM PDT by hope
|
Gorelick Licked |
|
By |
|
Published 4/14/2004 12:05:12 AM
|
|
|
His testimony is likely to be overshadowed by the president's news conference, but Attorney General John Ashcroft served notice yesterday that he is one administration player not afraid at all to go on offense against the Democratic louts on the so-called 9/11 commission. The full effect of the bombshell he dropped yesterday afternoon will take some time to settle.
"The single greatest structural cause for September 11 was the wall that segregated criminal investigators and intelligence agents," he said in his stirring and air-clearing opening remarks. "Government erected this wall. Government buttressed this wall. And before September 11, government was blinded by this wall."
Who built and reinforced this wall? Ashcroft pointed to Justice Department guidelines from 1995 that "imposed draconian barriers to communications between law enforcement and intelligence communities." It was a system "destined to fail." He pointed to investigations impeded by these rules, including efforts that might have nabbed three of the 9/11 conspirators weeks if not days before the attacks.
Then he got to his real point. The commission itself may not have known of the 1995 memorandum that laid out these guidelines -- "so I have declassified it for you and the public to review," Ashcroft told the commission. Next, the dagger: "Full disclosure compels me to inform you that its author is a member of this Commission."
Ashcroft did not need to name names for all to know that he had just outed Jamie Gorelick, the long-time number two in the Clinton Justice Department and one of the most transparently partisan Democrats on the 9/11 commission.
Not only did Ashcroft add to the growing pressure on Gorelick to testify before the commission rather than serve on it, specifically about what she and the administration she served failed to do about terrorism. Above all, he discredited her in the eyes of her fellow commissioners. Clearly she had never informed them of this memorandum. Now they were caught by surprise and made to look foolish.
One could detect the power of Ashcroft's bombshell in the subsequent questioning. Richard Ben-Veniste's edge turned to smarm. He greeted the two surprise guests who had accompanied Ashcroft to the hearing, his respected former deputy Larry Thompson and Solicitor General Ted Olson. Ben-Veniste referred to him as "Mr. Olson," and offered renewed condolences on the death of Barbara Olson on 9/11. With Olson on Ashcroft's side, there was no way he could look bad.
Ben-Veniste's only pointed question proved an embarrassment, repeating as it did morning press stories fed by Democrat leaks to the effect that Ashcroft would be asked about why he had started flying in government planes and not commercially before 9/11. When Ashcroft replied that all his personal flying had continued to be done commercially, as was his wife's, Ben-Veniste was left red-faced, grasping at a dwindling number of straws.
But he couldn't have been more red-faced than Gorelick. Initially she tried mouthing denials to fellow commissioners that she was author of the memo. But when a copy was handed to her, listing her as initialed author, she had nowhere to hide.
Her round of questions came last. Unlike Bob Kerrey, say, who was cordial with Ashcroft and even said it was good to see the AG "on the mend" after his recent hospitalization and operation, Gorelick established no human contact during her half-hearted queries -- none of which engaged the central point of Ashcroft's opening statement. The Democrats wanted to play hardball, but ended up clubbed on the head themselves.
Wlady Pleszczynski is executive editor of The American Spectator and editor of its website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; airline; airlines; airlinesecurity; airportsecurity; aschcrofttestimony; ashcroft; attorneygeneral; barbaraolson; benveniste; commercialflights; gorelick; jamiecommie; jamiegorelick; johnashcroft; larrythompson; memo; memos; olson; solicitorgeneral; tas; tedolson; testimony; thompson; veniste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 last
To: hope
Rush playing Ashcroft now....the part where he exposes the Gorelick memo.
To: AGreatPer
I was not surprised to see her in her seat this morning. Things just don't move that fast that I could entertain her removal from the panel overnight. But when her rear gets taken off the commission--and I think it will--it will get reported.
Oh, yes, there will be spin galore, but the truth will be told, too. Ashcroft showed the way. Just SAY IT.
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Excellent cross-reference.
To: arjay
That would be Sabato, a presidential historian I believe out of UVA. Somebody help me here? He is usually better than the other "presidential historians" who are more or less butt lickers for dems.
124
posted on
04/14/2004 10:33:59 AM PDT
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a hundred pounds!)
To: hope
Point, set, match. Ka-ching!
125
posted on
04/14/2004 10:51:32 AM PDT
by
7.62 x 51mm
(• © • ™ • ® •)
To: oceanview
did this get any media coverage at all? Of course not. It was damning to Gorelick, Bin Veniste, and the 8 years of Klintoon.
To: hope
Yessss!
Two thumbs up for Ashcroft.
127
posted on
04/14/2004 11:04:24 AM PDT
by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: cyncooper
Glad Rush played the Bin-Vineste question about Ashcroft flying private before 9-11..Ashcroft made Bin Vineste look like the idiot he is.
128
posted on
04/14/2004 1:15:43 PM PDT
by
hope
(How far will your passion take you?)
To: hope
Help Someone Please!
I need to find where they post the transcripts to the testimony. When Timothy Roemer was questioning Louis Freeh I think he made a derogatory statement about Condoleeze Rice that had a racist or sexist connotation.
If anyone knows where I can read a transcript please post, thanks!
To: gunnedah
I'm sure some freeper would be able to help on this...may already be posted somewhere. will keep my eyes peeled and bump you if i find anything.
130
posted on
04/14/2004 3:43:13 PM PDT
by
hope
(How far will your passion take you?)
To: hope; Admin Moderator
"Gorelick Licked"
I am tempted to post an illustration of this title. But I will refrain. I've posted far, FAR less forms of pictures and had them pulled. I thought those were in the framework of appropriateness. I will abstain until I find the correct level of civility with all the new people around:):)
131
posted on
04/14/2004 4:05:18 PM PDT
by
BobS
To: hope
But he couldn't have been more red-faced than Gorelick. Initially she tried mouthing denials to fellow commissioners that she was author of the memo. But when a copy was handed to her, listing her as initialed author, she had nowhere to hide. Damn lying Democrats!
To: gunnedah
You can find the transcripts
here. I just checked, and the full transcript of that hearing is not up, yet, but Dr. Rice's prepared statement is there.
133
posted on
04/14/2004 4:27:07 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(John F. Kerry is a true Leftist idealogue — a true Leftist believer.)
To: hope
Thanks! I will keep looking.
To: Wolfstar
Thanks, eventually it may show up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson