Skip to comments.
Landmark Calls For Gorelick to Step Aside From 9/11 Commission
Landmark Legal Foundation ^
| April 13, 2004
Posted on 04/13/2004 12:27:15 PM PDT by wcdukenfield
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Mich0127
Go Mark!
2
posted on
04/13/2004 12:28:51 PM PDT
by
jmstein7
(Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
To: holdonnow
Keep up the great work.
You're trying to fight the tide with a teaspoon, but at least you're fighting.
Gorelick, her handlers, and the GOP wimps like Kean are despicable.
3
posted on
04/13/2004 12:30:30 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: wcdukenfield
A leftist liberal doing the honorable thing? I wont hold my breath...
4
posted on
04/13/2004 12:30:51 PM PDT
by
smith288
(Who would terrorists want for president? 60% say Kerry 25% say Bush... Who would you vote for?)
To: wcdukenfield
Go get em Mark. Don't ever grow weary of doing good!
To: wcdukenfield
It is about time.
6
posted on
04/13/2004 12:33:09 PM PDT
by
tomball
To: wcdukenfield
Can you provide a direct link to the above letter?
To: dead
8
posted on
04/13/2004 12:33:57 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: wcdukenfield
YES!
Go, baby, Go!!
9
posted on
04/13/2004 12:34:19 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
To: wcdukenfield
!!PROPAGANDA ALERT!!
AOL Headlines:
'He Did Not Want to Hear'
Ashcroft Brushed Off Threats'
9/11Commission Witness Says
!!PROPAGANDA ALERT!!
10
posted on
04/13/2004 12:34:19 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
("Whom will the terrorists vote for? Not George Bush--that's for sure!" ~Happy2BMe)
To: wcdukenfield
Now if this were a Republican, yes, the liberal/socialist press would be howling for this person to get off. But, since it is a dem, never mind. Move on.
11
posted on
04/13/2004 12:34:37 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: wcdukenfield
If Ms. Gorelick does not immediately step aside, many in the public will undoubtedly conclude that the Commission's work has been compromised. I've already concluded this.
12
posted on
04/13/2004 12:35:58 PM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: wcdukenfield
I can't believe this woman is even on the commission.
The entire thing is a farce. No credibility and a total waste of time for all the posturing.
13
posted on
04/13/2004 12:36:33 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
(John Kerry - Cheezewhiz for the mind - marshmallow mush for the masses)
To: wcdukenfield
Dittos!
14
posted on
04/13/2004 12:37:34 PM PDT
by
yeswecan
To: Fedora
Come see!
15
posted on
04/13/2004 12:40:49 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
To: wcdukenfield
Mark Levin is the best...he leaves no stone unturned!
To: smith288
What information do you have to conclude that he is a leftist liberal?
17
posted on
04/13/2004 12:45:32 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: wcdukenfield
Thanks for posting this. I totally agree with Landmark's position. Have been saying for weeks that both Richard Ben-Veniste and Jamie Gorelick had massive conflicts of interest since they both worked for the Clinton administration. I even called the 9/11 commission's Washington office about my concerns, but the guy I spoke with was hopelessly both disinterested and defensive.
There is no way, none, that this particular American can have any faith or trust in the work of this commission due to the Ben-Veniste and Gorelick conflicts of interest as well as:
- The obvious design of the public hearings to be sensational and to impact the presidential election. As I understand it, all of the people currently testifying publicly have already testified privately and under oath. So there is no valid reason for the public hearings that I can discern.
- The way the commission has allowed its public agenda to be driven by publication of a book by an obviously partisan, disgruntled, bigoted former Clinton-era official. This person is yet another individual with a massive conflict of interest, yet he is treated as though he's the most important witness.
- The focus of the public hearings almost exclusively on the Bush administration.
- The failure of the chairman to control the hearing room, allowing clapping from the audience, feeding the media circus with melodramatic calls for the National Security Advisor to testify, and for the White House to produce the PDB, and so on.
- The appearance of commissioners all over TV and radio, making judgements in public and in advance of the committee's report. As commissioners, they fill roles comparable to judges and should act with similar discretion. They have miserably failed in this role.
- The obvious partisan nature of the hearings, with the Democrats doing everything possible to get the public to believe that President Bush knew the attacks of 9/11 were going to happen and deliberately did nothing about it.
18
posted on
04/13/2004 12:45:41 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(John F. Kerry is a true Leftist idealogue — a true Leftist believer.)
Bump
19
posted on
04/13/2004 12:46:06 PM PDT
by
Rocket1968
(Democrats will crash and burn in 2004.)
To: OpusatFR
The entire thing is a farce. The wonderful thing is, I believe most of the U.S. agrees with your statement; apparently, the sheeple are not falling for the bag o' liberal tricks as much as they used to, and the more idiotically partisan activities (such as this one) that they engage in, the more that view will spread.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson