Landmark Calls For Gorelick to Step Aside From 9/11 Commission

Landmark Legal Foundation ^ | April 13, 2004

[jmstein7]

Go Mark!

[dead]

Keep up the great work.

You're trying to fight the tide with a teaspoon, but at least you're fighting.

Gorelick, her handlers, and the GOP wimps like Kean are despicable.

[smith288]

A leftist liberal doing the honorable thing? I wont hold my breath...

[Pres Raygun]

Go get em Mark. Don't ever grow weary of doing good!

[tomball]

It is about time.

[misunderestimated]

Can you provide a direct link to the above letter?

[Diogenesis]

Never give up. Never surrender.

"Book them, Dano"

GOTTA FREEP THIS

"Back in September 1994, I recommended to Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick
that the DoJ strengthen investigative powers against suspected 'undesirable aliens,' accelerating
deportation appeal proceedings and limiting U.S. participation in a visa waiver pilot program under which 9.5 million foreigners entered the U.S. in 1994."
[Former FBI Director Louis Freeh]

GORELICK MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE COMMISSION NOW

Making a mockery of justice, Jamie Gorelick, who REFUSED to take Former FBI Director Louis Freeh's
recommendation to protect US citizens viciously questioned National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice
on Thursday, April 8, 2004, in Washington. Isn't that special?

---

FREEP: Phone Commission at 202-331-4060
Email Commission at info@9-11commission.gov
Eleni121 spoke to the secreatry at the commission
whoshe stated that the best way to voice concern is in writing
--in the form of the email that is posted
but put Thomas Kean in the subject line.

DEMAND THAT GORELICK BE REMOVED!

info@9-11commission.gov

DONT FORGET - PUT THOMAS KEAN IN THE SUBJECT LINE

[mabelkitty]

YES!

Go, baby, Go!!

[Savage Beast]

!!PROPAGANDA ALERT!!

AOL Headlines:

'He Did Not Want to Hear'
Ashcroft Brushed Off Threats'
9/11Commission Witness Says

!!PROPAGANDA ALERT!!

[RetiredArmy]

Now if this were a Republican, yes, the liberal/socialist press would be howling for this person to get off. But, since it is a dem, never mind. Move on.

[1Old Pro]

If Ms. Gorelick does not immediately step aside, many in the public will undoubtedly conclude that the Commission's work has been compromised.

I've already concluded this.

[OpusatFR]

I can't believe this woman is even on the commission.

The entire thing is a farce. No credibility and a total waste of time for all the posturing.

[yeswecan]

Dittos!

[mabelkitty]

Come see!

[joyce11111]

Mark Levin is the best...he leaves no stone unturned!

[TopQuark]

What information do you have to conclude that he is a leftist liberal?

[Wolfstar]

Thanks for posting this. I totally agree with Landmark's position. Have been saying for weeks that both Richard Ben-Veniste and Jamie Gorelick had massive conflicts of interest since they both worked for the Clinton administration. I even called the 9/11 commission's Washington office about my concerns, but the guy I spoke with was hopelessly both disinterested and defensive.

There is no way, none, that this particular American can have any faith or trust in the work of this commission due to the Ben-Veniste and Gorelick conflicts of interest as well as:

• The obvious design of the public hearings to be sensational and to impact the presidential election. As I understand it, all of the people currently testifying publicly have already testified privately and under oath. So there is no valid reason for the public hearings that I can discern.
• The way the commission has allowed its public agenda to be driven by publication of a book by an obviously partisan, disgruntled, bigoted former Clinton-era official. This person is yet another individual with a massive conflict of interest, yet he is treated as though he's the most important witness.
• The focus of the public hearings almost exclusively on the Bush administration.
• The failure of the chairman to control the hearing room, allowing clapping from the audience, feeding the media circus with melodramatic calls for the National Security Advisor to testify, and for the White House to produce the PDB, and so on.
• The appearance of commissioners all over TV and radio, making judgements in public and in advance of the committee's report. As commissioners, they fill roles comparable to judges and should act with similar discretion. They have miserably failed in this role.
• The obvious partisan nature of the hearings, with the Democrats doing everything possible to get the public to believe that President Bush knew the attacks of 9/11 were going to happen and deliberately did nothing about it.

[Rocket1968]

Bump

[JennysCool]

The entire thing is a farce.

The wonderful thing is, I believe most of the U.S. agrees with your statement; apparently, the sheeple are not falling for the bag o' liberal tricks as much as they used to, and the more idiotically partisan activities (such as this one) that they engage in, the more that view will spread.