Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Red
18 USC 871 requires next in line. Rumsfeld is not "next" - so that doesn't apply. Arguably 18 USC 115 does. However, I still think it is a tough case and not at all clear cut.
525 posted on 04/13/2004 12:14:40 PM PDT by graf008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies ]


To: graf008
If memory serves, a convicted criminal in the New York prison system was recently sentenced to more time in prison for threatening to shoot the junior Senator from New York.

So your argument that Rummy is too far down the order of succession doesn't hold water. It is called communicating a terroristic threat. People are convicted of it all the time. Goes to conspiracy in a case like this where more than one person is involved.
743 posted on 04/13/2004 2:59:37 PM PDT by ex 98C MI Dude (Proud Member of the Republican Attack Squad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson