Replies

I think you are failing to follow the thread. I replied to your comment that you would vote "No" on Coors because the company offered health benefits to homosexuals. That isn't socialism. It's private enterprise offering whatever benefits it chooses to offer.

And then I pointed out that you have two Democrat senators in your state and perhaps that is a result of purists like yourself who would vote "no" on a conservative Republicans over one issue.

We have good conservative candidates running for this seat. They are not socialists and some of your comments don't really seem to apply. Have a nice day in Michigan.

And then I pointed out that you have two Democrat senators in your state and perhaps that is a result of purists like yourself who would vote "no" on a conservative Republicans over one issue.

Ok, now I understand where your comment came from. I'm a purist in the primary, but I'll vote for the lesser of two evils in the general election. I've rarely found the democrat choice to be the lesser evil, so I usually end up voting GOP. I don't disagree that Coors will be the best candidate. I'm just disappointed that he didn't stand up to the homo lobby as a corporate chief. I can't imagine he'll do much better in Congress.