Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Freepmail for fill text.
1 posted on 04/12/2004 11:55:18 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; Howlin; ..
PING
2 posted on 04/12/2004 11:56:00 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
bttt
5 posted on 04/12/2004 12:01:10 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I can't imagine, she is so determined that there WAS information regarding 9/11 .... hmmm ... have to contemplate this one a bit.
6 posted on 04/12/2004 12:01:15 PM PDT by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Nice post. Further evidence that Gorelick should not be on the committee, but testifying BEFORE IT!
7 posted on 04/12/2004 12:01:16 PM PDT by July 4th (You need to click "Abstimmen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Well, frankly I'm glad Clinton didn't have the authority to unilaterally designate, say, Gun Owners of America as a terrorist group.
8 posted on 04/12/2004 12:01:26 PM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: prairiebreeze
Well lookie here.
9 posted on 04/12/2004 12:01:35 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
You have uncovered the most damning evidence against Clarke and this Commission that I've seen.

GORELICK STEP DOWN & TESITFY! is a demand the public must make. She is on the wrong side of that dais and her conflict of interests are glaring. Louis Freeh's publicly naming her in his editorial this morning along with your find means this woman needs to be grilled!

Thank you for your investigative skills.
11 posted on 04/12/2004 12:02:57 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Un-freakin-believable.

There is absolutely NO WAY that Gorelick should have been allowed on the 9/11 Commission. NO WAY!!!!
13 posted on 04/12/2004 12:06:05 PM PDT by Bryan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Great work!!
15 posted on 04/12/2004 12:13:09 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I found this quote interesting from Ms. Gorelick. A little unfocused and looking in the wrong direction, but accurate none the less.

The penalty for failure could be severe. "Massive networking makes the US the world's most vulnerable target," said William Studeman, former deputy director of the CIA. Jamie Gorelick, a former deputy attorney-general, was even more blunt in her address to a Senate hearing on the subject: "We will have a cyber equivalent of Pearl Harbor."

From The Sunday Times - May 17, 1998

18 posted on 04/12/2004 12:35:21 PM PDT by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Another one from a different source. These people had their eue onthe wrong ball...

Speaking at a Senate hearing last November, Jamie Gorelick, former U.S. deputy attorney general, was brutally blunt: "We will have a cyber equivalent of Pearl Harbour at some point, and we do not want to wait for that wake-up call." I [internet]-War, she added, "can disable or disrupt the provision of services just as readily -- if not more than -- a well-placed bomb."

The Ottawa Citizen - April 19, 1998, Sunday, FINAL EDITION

20 posted on 04/12/2004 12:37:51 PM PDT by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I was doing some research on Al Gore this morning, since he was in charge of the 1996 plan to put a million aliens on the fast track to citizenship even if they didn't qualify and even if they had criminal records. Gorelick's name came up there as well...

However, the IG report also said its investigation revealed that at least one official at the National Performance Review office "believed that the [citizenship] program had a deadline that was directly connected to the upcoming election."

That official, Douglas Farbrother, raised his concerns with Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick and senior INS officials in March 1996 that the program was behind schedule.

Source

And then there's more info on Gorelick I also found this morning:

Gorelick, formerly the number two person in the Clinton Justice Department is a Democratic appointee to the Commission charged with preparing a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Gorelick was an inappropriate choice for that position because she is a partner in the Washington law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering. According to Newsweek, Wilmer, Cutler represents Prince Mohammed al Faisal in the suit by the 9/11 families. The families contend that al Faisal has legal responsibility for the 9/11 attacks.

Source

While the source is a web blog, it seems to be thoroughly researched with links to legitimate stories that back it up. It also questions whether Zelikow should also resign.
21 posted on 04/12/2004 12:44:59 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Anyone know what the selection process was for the committee members? I'd like to know how she got on the panel in the first place. The committee is completely tainted and shouldn't be allowed to proceed with this investigation.
22 posted on 04/12/2004 12:46:07 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
More info on Gorelick (and Clarke). The first story is important because of John Kerry's slip-up on Larry King's Sep 11th show about TWA Flight 800 being a terrorist attack:

Those who have followed the fate of this disaster know that TWA Flight 800 is the 600,000 pound gorilla in the 9-11 commission's room. As we have previously documented, at least two of the stars of this commission – panelist Jamie Gorelick and former CSG head Richard Clarke – played key roles in the suppression of the true story of the plane's demise.

WND

On Aug. 22, 1996, just a few days before the start of the Democratic National Convention, Ms. Gorelick oversaw a critical Justice Department meeting with the FBI. Immediately after this meeting, as it happened, all serious inquiry into the fate of TWA 800 came to an end.

On the next day, for instance, the FAA began to inquire whether any dog-training exercises had ever taken place on the plane that would become TWA 800. On the same day, as CNN reported, the FBI now claimed publicly for the first time that the explosive residue found along the right wing "could have been brought on the plane by a passenger and was not part of a bomb." Likewise, after the meeting, the FBI would do no more eyewitness interviews, at least not for the next two months. The Bureau only did a handful after that – and all of those for the wrong reasons.

WND

See also:

FAA special agent blows whistle on FBI-TWA Flight 800

23 posted on 04/12/2004 1:17:49 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
Oh crap...we need to get Gorelick off of the commission NOW:

THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION: The Mysterious Jamie Gorelick Phone Call

Sure wish I could find a better source for this, but it does list the sources, albeit without links.

24 posted on 04/12/2004 1:29:40 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
From Clarke's Against All Enemies, p. 127 (although it is one of those "consider the source" type things):

"Another Conspiracy Theory intrigued me because I could never disprove it. The theory seemed unlikely on its face: Ramzi Yousef or Khalid Sheik Muhammad had taught Terry Nichols how to blow up the Oklahoma Federal Building. The problem was that, upon investigation, we established that both Ramzi Yousef and Nichols had been in the city of Cebu on the same days. I had been to Cebu years earlier; it is on an island in the central Philippines. It was a town in which word could have spread that a local girl was bringing her American boy friend home and that the American hated the U.S. government.

Yousef and Khalid Sheik Muhammad had gone there to help create an al Qaeda spinoff, a Philippine affiliate chapter, named after a hero of the Afghan war against the Soviets, Abu Sayaff. Could the al Qaeda explosives expert have been introduced to the angry American who proclaimed his hatred for the U.S. Government? We do not know, despite some FBI investigation. We do know that Nichols's bombs did not work before his Philippine stay and were deadly when he returned. We also know that Nichols continued to call Cebu long after his wife returned to the United States. The final coincidence is that several al Qaeda operatives had attended a radical Islamic conference a few years earliler in, of all places, Oklahoma City.

Source

It backs up the theory that OKC may have been a huge cover-up by Gorelick and crew.

27 posted on 04/12/2004 2:02:39 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
I don't trust Clinton to make the distinction between what is or is not a terrorist group - Hillary would call Free Republic a terrorist group.

I understand the ramifications of the parties involved, but read this in context (outside of 9/11) and I can't say any of us would have supported the corrupted one picking and choosing America's enemies.

He of the "hate crime" law.
29 posted on 04/12/2004 2:18:21 PM PDT by mabelkitty (A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
"Freepmail for fill text."

I don't know what that means, but I fired off an email to the 9-11 commission[for all the good that will do.].

Evidently there really is no difference between "non-partisan" and "partisan".

info@9-11Commission.gov

35 posted on 04/12/2004 5:32:57 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot – I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson